mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Large Language Models as Evaluators for Recommendation Explanations

arXiv 2406.03248 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2024cs.IR cs.CLcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The explainability of recommender systems has attracted significant attention in academia and industry. Many efforts have been made for explainable recommendations, yet evaluating the quality of the explanations remains a challenging and unresolved issue. In recent years, leveraging LLMs as evaluators presents a promising avenue in Natural Language Processing tasks (e.g., sentiment classification, information extraction), as they perform strong capabilities in instruction following and common-sense reasoning. However, evaluating recommendation explanatory texts is different from these NLG tasks, as its criteria are related to human perceptions and are usually subjective. In this paper, we investigate whether LLMs can serve as evaluators of recommendation explanations. To answer the question, we utilize real user feedback on explanations given from previous work and additionally collect third-party annotations and LLM evaluations. We design and apply a 3-level meta evaluation strategy to measure the correlation between evaluator labels and the ground truth provided by users. Our experiments reveal that LLMs, such as GPT4, can provide comparable evaluations with appropriate prompts and settings. We also provide further insights into combining human labels with the LLM evaluation process and utilizing ensembles of multiple heterogeneous LLM evaluators to enhance the accuracy and stability of evaluations. Our study verifies that utilizing LLMs as evaluators can be an accurate, reproducible and cost-effective solution for evaluating recommendation explanation texts. Our code is available at https://github.com/Xiaoyu-SZ/LLMasEvaluator.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2024.

Builds on

19 of 40 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  4. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  5. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
  6. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  7. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
  8. 2021Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learningcited by 641
  9. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 420
  10. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 416
  11. 2018Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 210
  12. 2023AnnoLLM: Making Large Language Models to Be Better Crowdsourced Annotatorscited by 171
7 more
  1. 2021Constrained Language Models Yield Few-Shot Semantic Parserscited by 162
  2. 2022Personalized Prompt Learning for Explainable Recommendationcited by 79
  3. 2020Analysis of Q-learning with Adaptation and Momentum Restart for Gradient Descentcited by 26
  4. 2021Generate Natural Language Explanations for Recommendationcited by 22
  5. 2022Measuring "Why" in Recommender Systems: a Comprehensive Survey on the Evaluation of Explainable Recommendationcited by 14
  6. 2024Neighborhood-Enhanced Supervised Contrastive Learning for Collaborative Filteringcited by 10
  7. 2024Collaborative-Enhanced Prediction of Spending on Newly Downloaded Mobile Games under Consumption Uncertaintycited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 5; 2026: 7.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgecited by 480
  2. 2024OpenEP: Open-Ended Future Event Predictioncited by 11
  3. 2025Improving LLM-powered Recommendations with Personalized Informationcited by 9
  4. 2025What do Large Language Models Say About Animals? Investigating Risks of Animal Harm in Generated Textcited by 9
  5. 2024Automated Review Generation Method Based on Large Language Modelscited by 7
  6. 2024Unveiling and Mitigating Bias in Large Language Model Recommendations: A Path to Fairnesscited by 6
  7. 2024An Empirical Evaluation of Large Language Models on Consumer Health Questionscited by 6
  8. 2025Evaluating the Evaluators: Are readability metrics good measures of readability?cited by 6
  9. 2024Disentangling Likes and Dislikes in Personalized Generative Explainable Recommendationcited by 3
  10. 2026GISTBench: Evaluating LLM User Understanding via Evidence-Based Interest Verificationcited by 3
  11. 2025SAGE: A Search-AuGmented Evaluation of Large Language Models on Free-Form QAcited by 2
  12. 2026AI and My Values: User Perceptions of LLMs' Ability to Extract, Embody, and Explain Human Values from Casual Conversationscited by 2
7 more
  1. 2024RecSys Arena: Pair-wise Recommender System Evaluation with Large Language Modelscited by 1
  2. 2025CORONA: A Coarse-to-Fine Framework for Graph-based Recommendation with Large Language Modelscited by 0
  3. 2026SAGE: Scalable AI Governance & Evaluationcited by 0
  4. 2026AgentGR: Semantic-aware Agentic Group Decision-Making Simulator for Group Recommendationcited by 0
  5. 2026Rethinking Code Performance Benchmarks for LLMscited by 0
  6. 2026The Utility of LLMs in Recommender Systems Explanation Evaluationcited by 0
  7. 2026XAI-Arena: Can LLMs Assess the Quality of XAI Explanations?cited by 0