CirrusBench: Evaluating LLM-based Agents Beyond Correctness in Real-World Cloud Service Environments
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
The increasing agentic capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled their deployment in real-world applications, such as cloud services, where customer-assistant interactions exhibit high technical complexity and long-horizon dependencies, making robustness and resolution efficiency critical for customer satisfaction. However, existing benchmarks for LLM-based agents largely rely on synthetic environments that fail to capture the diversity and unpredictability of authentic customer inputs, often ignoring the resolution efficiency essential for real-world deployment. To bridge this gap, we introduce CirrusBench, a novel evaluation framework distinguished by its foundation in real-world data from authentic cloud service tickets. CirrusBench preserves the intricate multi-turn logical chains and realistic tool dependencies inherent to technical service environments. Moving beyond execution correctness, we introduce novel Customer-Centric metrics to define agent success, quantifying service quality through metrics such as the Normalized Efficiency Index and Multi-Turn Latency to explicitly measure resolution efficiency. Experiments utilizing our framework reveal that while state-of-the-art models demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities, they frequently struggle in complex, realistic multi-turn tasks and fail to meet the high-efficiency standards required for customer service, highlighting critical directions for the future development of LLM-based agents in practical technical service applications. CirrusBench evaluation framework is released at: https://github.com/CirrusAI
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 29 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2026.
Builds on
29 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025VitaBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents with Versatile Interactive Tasks in Real-world Applications30 Sep
- 2025LongCat-Flash Technical Report1 Sep
- 2025GLM-4.5: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding (ARC) Foundation Models8 Aug
- 2025UserBench: An Interactive Gym Environment for User-Centric Agents29 Jul
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains17 Jun
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents7 Aug
Other references · 23
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
- 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,197
- 2018MultiWOZ -- A Large-Scale Multi-Domain Wizard-of-Oz Dataset for Task-Oriented Dialogue Modellingcited by 760
- 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 558
- 2015Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Taskscited by 309
- 2023ToolQA: A Dataset for LLM Question Answering with External Toolscited by 273
- 2024ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilitiescited by 272
11 more
- 2023MetaTool Benchmark for Large Language Models: Deciding Whether to Use Tools and Which to Usecited by 209
- 2019Taskmaster-1: Toward a Realistic and Diverse Dialog Datasetcited by 139
- 2023Towards Efficient Generative Large Language Model Serving: A Survey from Algorithms to Systemscited by 101
- 2021Action-Based Conversations Dataset: A Corpus for Building More In-Depth Task-Oriented Dialogue Systemscited by 73
- 2023ToolTalk: Evaluating Tool-Usage in a Conversational Settingcited by 42
- 2023Simple LLM Prompting is State-of-the-Art for Robust and Multilingual Dialogue Evaluationcited by 19
- 2024Interpretable User Satisfaction Estimation for Conversational Systems with Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2024MTU-Bench: A Multi-granularity Tool-Use Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 17
- 2025Evaluating, Synthesizing, and Enhancing for Customer Support Conversationcited by 7
- 2025Neural Models and Language Model Prompting for the Multidimensional Evaluation of Open-Ended Conversationscited by 2
- 2025When Users Are Happy but Agents Are Wrong: Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Tool-Augmented Dialoguecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025OdysseyBench: Evaluating LLM Agents on Long-Horizon Complex Office Application Workflows
- 2026ClawsBench: Evaluating Capability and Safety of LLM Productivity Agents in Simulated Workspaces
- 2026EComStage: Stage-wise and Orientation-specific Benchmarking for Large Language Models in E-commerce
- 2024ShortcutsBench: A Large-Scale Real-world Benchmark for API-based Agents
- 2026PolyWorkBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Cross-Lingual Long-Horizon Workflows
- 2026AgentPerfBench: A Benchmarking and Evaluation Suite for Inference Performance of Agentic LLMs
- 2026Benchmark Test-Time Scaling of General LLM Agents
- 2026Efficient LLM Serving for Agentic Workflows: A Data Systems Perspective