Explaining, Verifying, and Aligning Semantic Hierarchies in Vision-Language Model Embeddings
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-language model (VLM) encoders such as CLIP enable strong retrieval and zero-shot classification in a shared image-text embedding space, yet the semantic organization of this space is rarely inspected. We present a post-hoc framework to explain, verify, and align the semantic hierarchies induced by a VLM over a given set of child classes. First, we extract a binary hierarchy by agglomerative clustering of class centroids and name internal nodes by dictionary-based matching to a concept bank. Second, we quantify plausibility by comparing the extracted tree against human ontologies using efficient tree- and edge-level consistency measures, and we evaluate utility via explainable hierarchical tree-traversal inference with uncertainty-aware early stopping (UAES). Third, we propose an ontology-guided post-hoc alignment method that learns a lightweight embedding-space transformation, using UMAP to generate target neighborhoods from a desired hierarchy. Across 13 pretrained VLMs and 4 image datasets, our method finds systematic modality differences: image encoders are more discriminative, while text encoders induce hierarchies that better match human taxonomies. Overall, the results reveal a persistent trade-off between zero-shot accuracy and ontological plausibility and suggest practical routes to improve semantic alignment in shared embedding spaces.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 31 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2026.
Builds on
31 of 73 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Waffling around for Performance: Visual Classification with Random Words and Broad Concepts12 Jun
Other references · 30
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2016ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledgecited by 1,065
- 2021FLAVA: A Foundational Language And Vision Alignment Modelcited by 646
- 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 572
- 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 553
- 2022Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 289
18 more
- 2020Logic Tensor Networkscited by 197
- 2018Net2Vec: Quantifying and Explaining how Concepts are Encoded by Filters in Deep Neural Networkscited by 128
- 2020Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation Vectorscited by 119
- 2024Interpreting CLIP with Sparse Linear Concept Embeddings (SpLiCE)cited by 116
- 2019Making Better Mistakes: Leveraging Class Hierarchies with Deep Networkscited by 112
- 2023CHiLS: Zero-Shot Image Classification with Hierarchical Label Setscited by 79
- 2020Hierarchical Image Classification using Entailment Cone Embeddingscited by 46
- 2022Improving Zero-shot Generalization and Robustness of Multi-modal Modelscited by 44
- 2024Emergent Visual-Semantic Hierarchies in Image-Text Representationscited by 19
- 2024Concept-Based Explanations in Computer Vision: Where Are We and Where Could We Go?cited by 17
- 2022ECLAD: Extracting Concepts with Local Aggregated Descriptorscited by 15
- 2024Open-Set Recognition in the Age of Vision-Language Modelscited by 13
- 2021Verification of Size Invariance in DNN Activations using Concept Embeddingscited by 9
- 2023Local Concept Embeddings for Analysis of Concept Distributions in Vision DNN Feature Spacescited by 7
- 2024Does VLM Classification Benefit from LLM Description Semantics?cited by 6
- 2025Quantifying Structure in CLIP Embeddings: A Statistical Framework for Concept Interpretationcited by 6
- 2023Revealing Similar Semantics Inside CNNs: An Interpretable Concept-based Comparison of Feature Spacescited by 4
- 2025On Background Bias of Post-Hoc Concept Embeddings in Computer Vision DNNscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Segmenting Visuals With Querying Words: Language Anchors For Semi-Supervised Image Segmentation
- 2026Supervised Classification Heads as Semantic Prototypes: Unlocking Vision-Language Alignment via Weight Recycling
- 2025Hierarchy-Aware Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models
- 20233VL: Using Trees to Improve Vision-Language Models' Interpretability
- 2026GraSP-VL: Length as a Semantic Granularity Interface for Vision-Language Representations
- 2024Unified Generative and Discriminative Training for Multi-modal Large Language Models
- 2023ProbVLM: Probabilistic Adapter for Frozen Vision-Language Models
- 2023Linear Spaces of Meanings: Compositional Structures in Vision-Language Models