mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

3VL: Using Trees to Improve Vision-Language Models' Interpretability

arXiv 2312.17345 ↗First posted 28 Dec 2023cs.CVcited by 7

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language models (VLMs) have proven to be effective at aligning image and text representations, producing superior zero-shot results when transferred to many downstream tasks. However, these representations suffer from some key shortcomings in understanding Compositional Language Concepts (CLC), such as recognizing objects' attributes, states, and relations between different objects. Moreover, VLMs typically have poor interpretability, making it challenging to debug and mitigate compositional-understanding failures. In this work, we introduce the architecture and training technique of Tree-augmented Vision-Language (3VL) model accompanied by our proposed Anchor inference method and Differential Relevance (DiRe) interpretability tool. By expanding the text of an arbitrary image-text pair into a hierarchical tree structure using language analysis tools, 3VL allows the induction of this structure into the visual representation learned by the model, enhancing its interpretability and compositional reasoning. Additionally, we show how Anchor, a simple technique for text unification, can be used to filter nuisance factors while increasing CLC understanding performance, e.g., on the fundamental VL-Checklist benchmark. We also show how DiRe, which performs a differential comparison between VLM relevancy maps, enables us to generate compelling visualizations of the reasons for a model's success or failure. Our code is available at: https://github.com/niryellinek/3VL.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 86 of its 119 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2023.

Builds on

86 of 119 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023COLA: A Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-image Retrieval5 May
  2. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?4 Oct
  3. 2022PyramidCLIP: Hierarchical Feature Alignment for Vision-language Model Pretraining29 Apr

Other references · 83

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  6. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  7. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  8. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  9. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  10. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  11. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  12. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
38 more
  1. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  2. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  3. 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,548
  4. 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
  5. 2019VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Languagecited by 1,291
  6. 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,224
  7. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,213
  8. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  9. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
  10. 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 626
  11. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 620
  12. 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 523
  13. 2021Image Segmentation Using Text and Image Promptscited by 509
  14. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  15. 2023Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionalitycited by 496
  16. 2017Scene Graph Generation by Iterative Message Passingcited by 462
  17. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 440
  18. 2021Supervision Exists Everywhere: A Data Efficient Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training Paradigmcited by 405
  19. 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 331
  20. 2018Image Generation from Scene Graphscited by 324
  21. 2021Generic Attention-model Explainability for Interpreting Bi-Modal and Encoder-Decoder Transformerscited by 316
  22. 2015Improved Semantic Representations From Tree-Structured Long Short-Term Memory Networkscited by 305
  23. 2020A Survey on Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 291
  24. 2022Visual Spatial Reasoningcited by 288
  25. 2019Action Genome: Actions as Composition of Spatio-temporal Scene Graphscited by 249
  26. 2019On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural Networkscited by 239
  27. 2018Videos as Space-Time Region Graphscited by 221
  28. 2020Neural Prototype Trees for Interpretable Fine-grained Image Recognitioncited by 213
  29. 2022Vision-Language Pre-Training with Triple Contrastive Learningcited by 212
  30. 2022ELEVATER: A Benchmark and Toolkit for Evaluating Language-Augmented Visual Modelscited by 141
  31. 2018Learning to Assemble Neural Module Tree Networks for Visual Groundingcited by 139
  32. 2021VALSE: A Task-Independent Benchmark for Vision and Language Models Centered on Linguistic Phenomenacited by 134
  33. 2022CyCLIP: Cyclic Contrastive Language-Image Pretrainingcited by 127
  34. 2017Learning to Reason: End-to-End Module Networks for Visual Question Answeringcited by 125
  35. 2021Deformable ProtoPNet: An Interpretable Image Classifier Using Deformable Prototypescited by 120
  36. 2020DRG: Dual Relation Graph for Human-Object Interaction Detectioncited by 117
  37. 2020PhraseCut: Language-based Image Segmentation in the Wildcited by 116
  38. 2022VL-CheckList: Evaluating Pre-trained Vision-Language Models with Objects, Attributes and Relationscited by 113

50 most cited of 83 All 83 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024In-Context Learning Improves Compositional Understanding of Vision-Language Models
  2. 2026Inference-Time Structural Reasoning for Compositional Vision-Language Understanding
  3. 2025COCO-Tree: Compositional Hierarchical Concept Trees for Enhanced Reasoning in Vision Language Models
  4. 2023Synthesize, Diagnose, and Optimize: Towards Fine-Grained Vision-Language Understanding
  5. 2023Contrasting Intra-Modal and Ranking Cross-Modal Hard Negatives to Enhance Visio-Linguistic Compositional Understanding
  6. 2025Large Vision-Language Model Alignment and Misalignment: A Survey Through the Lens of Explainability
  7. 2026Explaining, Verifying, and Aligning Semantic Hierarchies in Vision-Language Model Embeddings
  8. 2025Do VLMs Have Bad Eyes? Diagnosing Compositional Failures via Mechanistic Interpretability