mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Verification of Size Invariance in DNN Activations using Concept Embeddings

arXiv 2105.06727 ↗First posted 14 May 2021cs.CV cs.NEcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The benefits of deep neural networks (DNNs) have become of interest for safety critical applications like medical ones or automated driving. Here, however, quantitative insights into the DNN inner representations are mandatory. One approach to this is concept analysis, which aims to establish a mapping between the internal representation of a DNN and intuitive semantic concepts. Such can be sub-objects like human body parts that are valuable for validation of pedestrian detection. To our knowledge, concept analysis has not yet been applied to large object detectors, specifically not for sub-parts. Therefore, this work first suggests a substantially improved version of the Net2Vec approach (arXiv:1801.03454) for post-hoc segmentation of sub-objects. Its practical applicability is then demonstrated on a new concept dataset by two exemplary assessments of three standard networks, including the larger Mask R-CNN model (arXiv:1703.06870): (1) the consistency of body part similarity, and (2) the invariance of internal representations of body parts with respect to the size in pixels of the depicted person. The findings show that the representation of body parts is mostly size invariant, which may suggest an early intelligent fusion of information in different size categories.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2021.

Builds on

14 of 24 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  4. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  5. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  6. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  7. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  8. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
  9. 2014One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networkscited by 264
  10. 2019On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural Networkscited by 239
  11. 2017Tversky loss function for image segmentation using 3D fully convolutional deep networkscited by 228
  12. 2018Net2Vec: Quantifying and Explaining how Concepts are Encoded by Filters in Deep Neural Networkscited by 129
2 more
  1. 2020A Disentangling Invertible Interpretation Network for Explaining Latent Representationscited by 57
  2. 2019Semantics for Global and Local Interpretation of Deep Neural Networkscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

9 papers.