Local Concept Embeddings for Analysis of Concept Distributions in Vision DNN Feature Spaces
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Insights into the learned latent representations are imperative for verifying deep neural networks (DNNs) in critical computer vision (CV) tasks. Therefore, state-of-the-art supervised Concept-based eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (C-XAI) methods associate user-defined concepts like ``car'' each with a single vector in the DNN latent space (concept embedding vector). In the case of concept segmentation, these linearly separate between activation map pixels belonging to a concept and those belonging to background. Existing methods for concept segmentation, however, fall short of capturing implicitly learned sub-concepts (e.g., the DNN might split car into ``proximate car'' and ``distant car''), and overlap of user-defined concepts (e.g., between ``bus'' and ``truck''). In other words, they do not capture the full distribution of concept representatives in latent space. For the first time, this work shows that these simplifications are frequently broken and that distribution information can be particularly useful for understanding DNN-learned notions of sub-concepts, concept confusion, and concept outliers. To allow exploration of learned concept distributions, we propose a novel local concept analysis framework. Instead of optimizing a single global concept vector on the complete dataset, it generates a local concept embedding (LoCE) vector for each individual sample. We use the distribution formed by LoCEs to explore the latent concept distribution by fitting Gaussian mixture models (GMMs), hierarchical clustering, and concept-level information retrieval and outlier detection. Despite its context sensitivity, our method's concept segmentation performance is competitive to global baselines. Analysis results are obtained on three datasets and six diverse vision DNN architectures, including vision transformers (ViTs).
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 66 of its 108 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2023.
Builds on
66 of 108 references.
References · 66
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
38 more
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
- 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
- 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
- 2017Fine-tuning CNN Image Retrieval with No Human Annotationcited by 497
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 359
- 2019Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 357
- 2020Concept Whitening for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 225
- 2020A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learningcited by 225
- 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 177
- 2020Debugging Tests for Model Explanationscited by 146
- 2021Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Modelscited by 136
- 2018Net2Vec: Quantifying and Explaining how Concepts are Encoded by Filters in Deep Neural Networkscited by 128
- 2023Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A Manifesto of Open Challenges and Interdisciplinary Research Directionscited by 123
- 2020Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation Vectorscited by 119
- 2021A Comprehensive Taxonomy for Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Survey of Surveys on Methods and Conceptscited by 90
- 2020Explainable Artificial Intelligence: a Systematic Reviewcited by 79
- 2019Summit: Scaling Deep Learning Interpretability by Visualizing Activation and Attribution Summarizationscited by 72
- 2020A Decade Survey of Content Based Image Retrieval using Deep Learningcited by 72
- 2021This Looks Like That... Does it? Shortcomings of Latent Space Prototype Interpretability in Deep Networkscited by 65
- 2021Look at the Variance! Efficient Black-box Explanations with Sobol-based Sensitivity Analysiscited by 65
- 2020A Disentangling Invertible Interpretation Network for Explaining Latent Representationscited by 57
- 2022Concept Activation Regions: A Generalized Framework For Concept-Based Explanationscited by 57
- 2017Interpreting CNN Knowledge via an Explanatory Graphcited by 49
- 2019Interpretability Beyond Classification Output: Semantic Bottleneck Networkscited by 49
- 2023Multi-dimensional concept discovery (MCD): A unifying framework with completeness guaranteescited by 48
- 2021Inspect, Understand, Overcome: A Survey of Practical Methods for AI Safetycited by 35
- 2021A Peek Into the Reasoning of Neural Networks: Interpreting with Structural Visual Conceptscited by 33
- 2022Making Sense of Dependence: Efficient Black-box Explanations Using Dependence Measurecited by 33
- 2023A survey of the Vision Transformers and their CNN-Transformer based Variantscited by 33
50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024Concept-Based Explanations in Computer Vision: Where Are We and Where Could We Go?cited by 17
- 2024Unveiling Ontological Commitment in Multi-Modal Foundation Modelscited by 1
- 2025On Background Bias of Post-Hoc Concept Embeddings in Computer Vision DNNscited by 1
- 2025CE-FAM: Concept-Based Explanation via Fusion of Activation Mapscited by 1
- 2024The Anatomy of Adversarial Attacks: Concept-based XAI Dissectioncited by 0
- 2025Attack logics, not outputs: Towards efficient robustification of deep neural networks by falsifying concept-based propertiescited by 0
- 2026Explaining, Verifying, and Aligning Semantic Hierarchies in Vision-Language Model Embeddingscited by 0
- 2026Explaining, Verifying, and Aligning Semantic Hierarchies in Vision-Language Model Embeddings26 Mar 2026
- 2025Attack logics, not outputs: Towards efficient robustification of deep neural networks by falsifying concept-based properties1 Oct 2025
- 2025CE-FAM: Concept-Based Explanation via Fusion of Activation Maps28 Sep 2025
- 2025On Background Bias of Post-Hoc Concept Embeddings in Computer Vision DNNs11 Apr 2025
- 2024Unveiling Ontological Commitment in Multi-Modal Foundation Models25 Sep 2024
- 2024Concept-Based Explanations in Computer Vision: Where Are We and Where Could We Go?20 Sep 2024
- 2024The Anatomy of Adversarial Attacks: Concept-based XAI Dissection25 Mar 2024