mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MobileDev-Bench: A Benchmark for Issue Resolution in Mobile Application Development

arXiv 2603.24946 ↗First posted 26 Mar 2026cs.SE cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance on automated software engineering tasks, yet existing benchmarks focus primarily on library-style repositories, leaving mobile application development largely unexplored despite its framework-specific build systems, heterogeneous artifact types, and coordinated multi-file fix requirements. We introduce MobileDev-Bench, a benchmark comprising 407 real-world issue-resolution tasks collected from 19 production mobile applications spanning Android Native (Java/Kotlin), React Native (TypeScript), and Flutter (Dart). Each task pairs a verified developer-reported issue with executable test patches, enabling fully automated validation of model-generated fixes within mobile build environments. The benchmark exhibits substantially greater patch complexity than prior benchmarks: fixes modify 12.9 files and 334.6 lines on average, and 41% of instances require coordinated changes across multiple artifact types, such as source, build configuration, and resource files. Evaluation of four frontier LLMs (Claude Sonnet 4.5, Qwen3-Coder, GPT-5.2, and Gemini 2.5 Flash) yields end-to-end resolution rates of only 3.23% - 4.23% under automated retrieval and at most 5.69% under oracle retrieval, well below resolution rates reported on existing benchmarks. We release MobileDev-Bench with task instances, an evaluation harness, and containerized environments to support reproducible research on AI-assisted mobile application development.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2026.

Builds on

22 of 38 references.

References · 22

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  3. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  4. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  5. 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,105
  6. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
  7. 2024AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program Improvementcited by 272
  8. 2024SWE-bench Multimodal: Do AI Systems Generalize to Visual Software Domains?cited by 196
  9. 2023AutoDroid: LLM-powered Task Automation in Androidcited by 178
  10. 2024MAGIS: LLM-Based Multi-Agent Framework for GitHub Issue Resolutioncited by 132
  11. 2024CodeR: Issue Resolving with Multi-Agent and Task Graphscited by 89
  12. 2025SWE-PolyBench: A multi-language benchmark for repository level evaluation of coding agentscited by 80
10 more
  1. 2024Mobile-Bench: An Evaluation Benchmark for LLM-based Mobile Agentscited by 56
  2. 2024MASAI: Modular Architecture for Software-engineering AI Agentscited by 49
  3. 2024SWE-bench-java: A GitHub Issue Resolving Benchmark for Javacited by 34
  4. 2025SWE-Bench++: A Framework for the Scalable Generation of Software Engineering Benchmarks from Open-Source Repositoriescited by 27
  5. 2025OmniGIRL: A Multilingual and Multimodal Benchmark for GitHub Issue Resolutioncited by 24
  6. 2020Patching as Translation: the Data and the Metaphorcited by 18
  7. 2024JavaBench: A Benchmark of Object-Oriented Code Generation for Evaluating Large Language Modelscited by 10
  8. 2026Evaluating and Improving Automated Repository-Level Rust Issue Resolution with LLM-based Agentscited by 7
  9. 2025SWE-Sharp-Bench: A Reproducible Benchmark for C# Software Engineering Taskscited by 4
  10. 2025Understanding and Detecting Platform-Specific Violations in Android Auto Appscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.