Mixture-Greedy for Online Generative Model Selection: Is UCB Necessary in Diversity-Aware Multi-Armed Bandits?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Efficient selection among multiple generative models is increasingly important in modern generative AI, where sampling from suboptimal models is costly. This problem can be viewed as a multi-armed bandit (MAB) task. Under diversity-aware evaluation scores, a non-degenerate mixture of generators can outperform any individual model, distinguishing this MAB setting from classical best-arm identification. Prior approaches incorporate an Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) exploration bonus into the mixture objective. However, across multiple datasets and evaluation metrics, we observe that the UCB term consistently slows convergence and reduces sample efficiency. In contrast, a simple Mixture-Greedy strategy without explicit UCB-type optimism converges faster and achieves even better performance, particularly for widely used metrics such as FID and Vendi where tight confidence bounds are difficult to construct. We provide theoretical insight explaining this behavior: under structural conditions, diversity-aware objectives induce implicit exploration by favoring interior mixtures, leading to sampling of all arms and sublinear regret guarantees for diversity-based objectives. These results suggest that in diversity-aware multi-armed bandits, e.g., for generative model selection, exploration can arise intrinsically from the objective's geometry.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2026.
Builds on
54 of 70 references.
References · 54
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,655
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
- 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 5,931
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,290
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2021Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 3,736
38 more
- 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
- 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
- 2018Demystifying MMD GANscited by 1,268
- 2019Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Modelscited by 925
- 2023PixArt-α: Fast Training of Diffusion Transformer for Photorealistic Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 854
- 2022Autoregressive Image Generation using Residual Quantizationcited by 706
- 2020NVAE: A Deep Hierarchical Variational Autoencodercited by 635
- 2022StyleGAN-XL: Scaling StyleGAN to Large Diverse Datasetscited by 489
- 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
- 2020Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative Modelscited by 425
- 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 420
- 2018Assessing Generative Models via Precision and Recallcited by 401
- 2022The Vendi Score: A Diversity Evaluation Metric for Machine Learningcited by 299
- 2022The Role of ImageNet Classes in Fr'echet Inception Distancecited by 211
- 2021Projected GANs Converge Fastercited by 204
- 2023Exposing flaws of generative model evaluation metrics and their unfair treatment of diffusion modelscited by 199
- 2021How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Modelscited by 193
- 2021Instance-Conditioned GANcited by 119
- 2023Kandinsky: an Improved Text-to-Image Synthesis with Image Prior and Latent Diffusioncited by 114
- 2017Mostly Exploration-Free Algorithms for Contextual Banditscited by 85
- 2022Rarity Score : A New Metric to Evaluate the Uncommonness of Synthesized Imagescited by 35
- 2020The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Greedy Algorithms in Multi-Armed Bandit with Many Armscited by 27
- 2022Efficient-VDVAE: Less is morecited by 26
- 2023Feature Likelihood Divergence: Evaluating the Generalization of Generative Models Using Samplescited by 25
- 2024Towards a Scalable Reference-Free Evaluation of Generative Modelscited by 25
- 2024An Interpretable Evaluation of Entropy-based Novelty of Generative Modelscited by 17
- 2024Unveiling Differences in Generative Models: A Scalable Differential Clustering Approachcited by 16
- 2024Quality-Weighted Vendi Scores And Their Application To Diverse Experimental Designcited by 15
- 2024Scendi Score: Prompt-Aware Diversity Evaluation via Schur Complement of CLIP Embeddingscited by 15
- 2025SPARKE: Scalable Prompt-Aware Diversity and Novelty Guidance in Diffusion Models via RKE Scorecited by 14
- 2024A Multi-Armed Bandit Approach to Online Selection and Evaluation of Generative Modelscited by 13
- 2024Be More Diverse than the Most Diverse: Optimal Mixtures of Generative Models via Mixture-UCB Bandit Algorithmscited by 13
- 2024Do Vendi Scores Converge with Finite Samples? Truncated Vendi Score for Finite-Sample Convergence Guaranteescited by 12
- 2025Kernel-based Unsupervised Embedding Alignment for Enhanced Visual Representation in Vision-language Modelscited by 12
- 2024PAK-UCB Contextual Bandit: An Online Learning Approach to Prompt-Aware Selection of Generative Models and LLMscited by 11
- 2025Towards an Explainable Comparison and Alignment of Feature Embeddingscited by 9
- 2023Statistical Complexity and Optimal Algorithms for Non-linear Ridge Banditscited by 7
- 2024Conditional Vendi Score: Prompt-Aware Diversity Evaluation for Generative AI Models and LLMscited by 6
50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.