mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Off-Policy Learning with Limited Supply

arXiv 2603.18702 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study off-policy learning (OPL) in contextual bandits, which plays a key role in a wide range of real-world applications such as recommendation systems and online advertising. Typical OPL in contextual bandits assumes an unconstrained environment where a policy can select the same item infinitely. However, in many practical applications, including coupon allocation and e-commerce, limited supply constrains items through budget limits on distributed coupons or inventory restrictions on products. In these settings, greedily selecting the item with the highest expected reward for the current user may lead to early depletion of that item, making it unavailable for future users who could potentially generate higher expected rewards. As a result, OPL methods that are optimal in unconstrained settings may become suboptimal in limited supply settings. To address the issue, we provide a theoretical analysis showing that conventional greedy OPL approaches may fail to maximize the policy performance, and demonstrate that policies with superior performance must exist in limited supply settings. Based on this insight, we introduce a novel method called Off-Policy learning with Limited Supply (OPLS). Rather than simply selecting the item with the highest expected reward, OPLS focuses on items with relatively higher expected rewards compared to the other users, enabling more efficient allocation of items with limited supply. Our empirical results on both synthetic and real-world datasets show that OPLS outperforms existing OPL methods in contextual bandit problems with limited supply.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2026.

Builds on

20 of 36 references.

References · 20

  1. 2018Breaking the Curse of Horizon: Infinite-Horizon Off-Policy Estimationcited by 226
  2. 2013Bandits with Knapsackscited by 163
  3. 2015Doubly Robust Policy Evaluation and Optimizationcited by 158
  4. 2018More Robust Doubly Robust Off-policy Evaluationcited by 141
  5. 2016Off-policy evaluation for slate recommendationcited by 102
  6. 2018Offline A/B testing for Recommender Systemscited by 94
  7. 2022KuaiRec: A Fully-observed Dataset and Insights for Evaluating Recommender Systemscited by 94
  8. 2022A Review of Off-Policy Evaluation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 92
  9. 2019Doubly robust off-policy evaluation with shrinkagecited by 87
  10. 2015Linear Contextual Bandits with Knapsackscited by 82
  11. 2020Open Bandit Dataset and Pipeline: Towards Realistic and Reproducible Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 77
  12. 2022Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via Embeddingscited by 53
8 more
  1. 2021Evaluating the Robustness of Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 32
  2. 2020Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation from Multiple Logging Policiescited by 30
  3. 2022Doubly Robust Off-Policy Evaluation for Ranking Policies under the Cascade Behavior Modelcited by 30
  4. 2024Off-Policy Evaluation of Slate Bandit Policies via Optimizing Abstractioncited by 17
  5. 2023Off-Policy Evaluation of Ranking Policies under Diverse User Behaviorcited by 16
  6. 2023Towards Assessing and Benchmarking Risk-Return Tradeoff of Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 13
  7. 2024POTEC: Off-Policy Learning for Large Action Spaces via Two-Stage Policy Decompositioncited by 13
  8. 2024Long-term Off-Policy Evaluation and Learningcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.