Efficient Offline Learning of Ranking Policies via Top-k Policy Decomposition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many recommender systems such as for e-commerce and news platforms aim to provide users with rankings they are likely to interact with. Off-Policy Learning (OPL) of ranking policies enables us to learn new ranking policies using only historical logged data. However, ranking settings make OPL remarkably challenging because their action spaces consist of permutations of unique items, being extremely large. Existing methods primarily use either policy- or regression-based approaches. The policy-based approach, which typically uses importance-weighted policy gradients, can suffer from high variance due to large action spaces. The regression-based approach, on the other hand, estimates the expected reward using conventional machine learning methods, avoiding variance issues but potentially suffering from severe bias. To circumvent these issues of existing methods, we propose a new OPL method for ranking, named Ranking Policy Optimization via Top-k Policy Decomposition (R-POD), which combines the policy- and regression-based approaches in an effective fashion. Specifically, R-POD decomposes a ranking policy into a first-stage policy for selecting top-k actions and a second-stage policy for choosing the bottom actions given the top-k actions. It learns the first-stage policy using a new policy gradient estimator and the second-stage policy via the regression-based approach. This method can substantially reduce variance, since it applies importance weighting only to the top-k actions. We also demonstrate that our policy-gradient estimator for the first-stage policy is unbiased under a conditional pairwise correctness condition, which only requires that the expected reward differences of pairs of rankings sharing the same top-k actions can be estimated correctly.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.
Builds on
16 of 34 references.
References · 16
- 2015Doubly Robust Policy Evaluation and Optimizationcited by 158
- 2016Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedbackcited by 155
- 2013Introducing LETOR 4.0 Datasetscited by 120
- 2018Unbiased Learning to Rank with Unbiased Propensity Estimationcited by 61
- 2020Off-policy Bandits with Deficient Supportcited by 60
- 2022Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via Embeddingscited by 53
- 2020Counterfactual Evaluation of Slate Recommendations with Sequential Reward Interactionscited by 35
- 2023Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via Conjunct Effect Modelingcited by 34
- 2018Offline Evaluation of Ranking Policies with Click Modelscited by 32
- 2022Doubly Robust Off-Policy Evaluation for Ranking Policies under the Cascade Behavior Modelcited by 30
- 2019Imitation-Regularized Offline Learningcited by 17
- 2024Off-Policy Evaluation of Slate Bandit Policies via Optimizing Abstractioncited by 17
4 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.