Interplay: Training Independent Simulators for Reference-Free Conversational Recommendation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training conversational recommender systems (CRS) requires extensive dialogue data, which is challenging to collect at scale. To address this, researchers have used simulated user-recommender conversations. Traditional simulation approaches often utilize a single large language model (LLM) that generates entire conversations with prior knowledge of the target items, leading to scripted and artificial dialogues. We propose a reference-free simulation framework that trains two independent LLMs, one as the user and one as the conversational recommender. These models interact in real-time without access to predetermined target items, but preference summaries and target attributes, enabling the recommender to genuinely infer user preferences through dialogue. This approach produces more realistic and diverse conversations that closely mirror authentic human-AI interactions. Our reference-free simulators match or exceed existing methods in quality, while offering a scalable solution for generating high-quality conversational recommendation data without constraining conversations to pre-defined target items. We conduct both quantitative and human evaluations to confirm the effectiveness of our reference-free approach.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2026.
Builds on
22 of 30 references.
References · 22
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2019TinyBERT: Distilling BERT for Natural Language Understandingcited by 1,153
- 2023Chat-REC: Towards Interactive and Explainable LLMs-Augmented Recommender Systemcited by 241
- 2018Towards Deep Conversational Recommendationscited by 174
- 2020A Survey on Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 142
- 2020Improving Conversational Recommender Systems via Knowledge Graph based Semantic Fusioncited by 122
- 2018Conversational Recommender Systemcited by 115
- 2022Towards Unified Conversational Recommender Systems via Knowledge-Enhanced Prompt Learningcited by 85
- 2023Rethinking the Evaluation for Conversational Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 48
- 2020Evaluating Conversational Recommender Systems via User Simulationcited by 46
- 2019Recommendation as a Communication Game: Self-Supervised Bot-Play for Goal-oriented Dialoguecited by 44
- 2024A Multi-Agent Conversational Recommender Systemcited by 42
10 more
- 2023PlatoLM: Teaching LLMs in Multi-Round Dialogue via a User Simulatorcited by 28
- 2024How Reliable is Your Simulator? Analysis on the Limitations of Current LLM-based User Simulators for Conversational Recommendationcited by 25
- 2024Doing Personal LAPS: LLM-Augmented Dialogue Construction for Personalized Multi-Session Conversational Searchcited by 24
- 2024Pearl: A Review-driven Persona-Knowledge Grounded Conversational Recommendation Datasetcited by 15
- 2025Don't lie to your friends: Learning what you know from collaborative self-playcited by 14
- 2024A LLM-based Controllable, Scalable, Human-Involved User Simulator Framework for Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 12
- 2025An Empirical Study on Zero-Data Bootstrapping for Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 5
- 2023A Conversation is Worth A Thousand Recommendations: A Survey of Holistic Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 3
- 2025Empowering Retrieval-based Conversational Recommendation with Contrasting User Preferencescited by 3
- 2023Multi-Objective Intrinsic Reward Learning for Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.