mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ARES: Scalable and Practical Gradient Inversion Attack in Federated Learning through Activation Recovery

arXiv 2603.17623 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training by sharing model updates instead of raw data, aiming to protect user privacy. However, recent studies reveal that these shared updates can inadvertently leak sensitive training data through gradient inversion attacks (GIAs). Among them, active GIAs are particularly powerful, enabling high-fidelity reconstruction of individual samples even under large batch sizes. Nevertheless, existing approaches often require architectural modifications, which limit their practical applicability. In this work, we bridge this gap by introducing the Activation REcovery via Sparse inversion (ARES) attack, an active GIA designed to reconstruct training samples from large training batches without requiring architectural modifications. Specifically, we formulate the recovery problem as a noisy sparse recovery task and solve it using the generalized Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso). To extend the attack to multi-sample recovery, ARES incorporates the imprint method to disentangle activations, enabling scalable per-sample reconstruction. We further establish the expected recovery rate and derive an upper bound on the reconstruction error, providing theoretical guarantees for the ARES attack. Extensive experiments on CNNs and MLPs demonstrate that ARES achieves high-fidelity reconstruction across diverse datasets, significantly outperforming prior GIAs under large batch sizes and realistic FL settings. Our results highlight that intermediate activations pose a serious and underestimated privacy risk in FL, underscoring the urgent need for stronger defenses.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2026.

Builds on

30 of 50 references.

References · 30

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  3. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
  4. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
  5. 2016CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimizationcited by 641
  6. 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 459
  7. 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 382
  8. 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 326
  9. 2021A Field Guide to Federated Optimizationcited by 315
  10. 2021Federated Learning with Buffered Asynchronous Aggregationcited by 190
  11. 2021Federated Learning for Smart Healthcare: A Surveycited by 184
  12. 2021When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Privatecited by 127
18 more
  1. 2021Robbing the Fed: Directly Obtaining Private Data in Federated Learning with Modified Modelscited by 108
  2. 2019Lung and Colon Cancer Histopathological Image Dataset (LC25000)cited by 89
  3. 2021Federated Learning: Opportunities and Challengescited by 84
  4. 2022Fishing for User Data in Large-Batch Federated Learning via Gradient Magnificationcited by 73
  5. 2018AudioMNIST: Exploring Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Audio Analysis on a Simple Benchmarkcited by 72
  6. 2021Eluding Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning via Model Inconsistencycited by 67
  7. 2022Decepticons: Corrupted Transformers Breach Privacy in Federated Learning for Language Modelscited by 53
  8. 2022Gradient Obfuscation Gives a False Sense of Security in Federated Learningcited by 39
  9. 2023LOKI: Large-scale Data Reconstruction Attack against Federated Learning through Model Manipulationcited by 36
  10. 2020Privacy-preserving Collaborative Learning with Automatic Transformation Searchcited by 31
  11. 2023Scale-MIA: A Scalable Model Inversion Attack against Secure Federated Learning via Latent Space Reconstructioncited by 21
  12. 2024Revisiting Gradient Pruning: A Dual Realization for Defending against Gradient Attackscited by 7
  13. 2025Uncovering Gradient Inversion Risks in Practical Language Model Trainingcited by 7
  14. 2023AGRAMPLIFIER: Defending Federated Learning Against Poisoning Attacks Through Local Update Amplificationcited by 5
  15. 2025Boosting Gradient Leakage Attacks: Data Reconstruction in Realistic FL Settingscited by 5
  16. 2025Not All Edges are Equally Robust: Evaluating the Robustness of Ranking-Based Federated Learningcited by 4
  17. 2026Mitigating Gradient Inversion Risks in Language Models via Token Obfuscationcited by 2
  18. 2026Beyond Denial-of-Service: The Puppeteer's Attack for Fine-Grained Control in Ranking-Based Federated Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.