mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Uncovering Gradient Inversion Risks in Practical Language Model Training

arXiv 2507.21198 ↗First posted 28 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The gradient inversion attack has been demonstrated as a significant privacy threat to federated learning (FL), particularly in continuous domains such as vision models. In contrast, it is often considered less effective or highly dependent on impractical training settings when applied to language models, due to the challenges posed by the discrete nature of tokens in text data. As a result, its potential privacy threats remain largely underestimated, despite FL being an emerging training method for language models. In this work, we propose a domain-specific gradient inversion attack named Grab (gradient inversion with hybrid optimization). Grab features two alternating optimization processes to address the challenges caused by practical training settings, including a simultaneous optimization on dropout masks between layers for improved token recovery and a discrete optimization for effective token sequencing. Grab can recover a significant portion (up to 92.9% recovery rate) of the private training data, outperforming the attack strategy of utilizing discrete optimization with an auxiliary model by notable improvements of up to 28.9% recovery rate in benchmark settings and 48.5% recovery rate in practical settings. Grab provides a valuable step forward in understanding this privacy threat in the emerging FL training mode of language models.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2025.

Builds on

24 of 51 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  6. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  7. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  8. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  9. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 958
  10. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 878
  11. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
  12. 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 382
12 more
  1. 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 326
  2. 2018A Survey on Deep Learning for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 282
  3. 2021Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learningcited by 196
  4. 2022Quantifying Privacy Risks of Masked Language Models Using Membership Inference Attackscited by 175
  5. 2020InstaHide: Instance-hiding Schemes for Private Distributed Learningcited by 90
  6. 2022Recovering Private Text in Federated Learning of Language Modelscited by 70
  7. 2021TAG: Gradient Attack on Transformer-based Language Modelscited by 63
  8. 2022LAMP: Extracting Text from Gradients with Language Model Priorscited by 54
  9. 2022Decepticons: Corrupted Transformers Breach Privacy in Federated Learning for Language Modelscited by 53
  10. 2021APRIL: Finding the Achilles' Heel on Privacy for Vision Transformerscited by 24
  11. 2022Federated Few-Shot Learning for Mobile NLPcited by 15
  12. 2022Dropout is NOT All You Need to Prevent Gradient Leakagecited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

7 papers.