Interpretable Predictability-Based AI Text Detection: A Replication Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper replicates and extends the system used in the AuTexTification shared task for authorship attribution of machine-generated texts. Exact replication was not possible because of differences in data splits, model availability, and implementation details, which we document as a case study in reproducibility. We tested newer multilingual language models (mDeBERTa-v3-base, Qwen, mGPT) and added 26 document-level stylometric features, using ablation, permutation importance, and SHAP analysis to assess feature influence. A single shared configuration was applied to both English and Spanish across Subtask 1 and Subtask 2. Averaged over three random seeds, the shared multilingual configuration performs comparably to or better than the language-specific baseline, with the clearest gains on model attribution (Subtask 2). The additional stylometric features yield small improvements, led by lexical diversity, but their contribution falls within seed variance once predictability-based probabilities are included, which remain the dominant signal. The study also shows that clear documentation is important for reliable replication and fair comparison of systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2026.
Builds on
24 of 43 references.
References · 24
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
- 2019How multilingual is Multilingual BERT?cited by 645
- 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
- 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
- 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
- 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 210
12 more
- 2022mGPT: Few-Shot Learners Go Multilingualcited by 142
- 2017On the State of the Art of Evaluation in Neural Language Modelscited by 104
- 2024DeTeCtive: Detecting AI-generated Text via Multi-Level Contrastive Learningcited by 53
- 2024Few-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text using Style Representationscited by 40
- 2022Findings of the The RuATD Shared Task 2022 on Artificial Text Detection in Russiancited by 29
- 2024Robust AI-Generated Text Detection by Restricted Embeddingscited by 18
- 2023IMGTB: A Framework for Machine-Generated Text Detection Benchmarkingcited by 12
- 2025Authorship Attribution in Multilingual Machine-Generated Textscited by 8
- 2025Adversarial Attacks on AI-Generated Text Detection Models: A Token Probability-Based Approach Using Embeddingscited by 5
- 2023Classification of Human- and AI-Generated Texts for English, French, German, and Spanishcited by 4
- 2024PetKaz at SemEval-2024 Task 8: Can Linguistics Capture the Specifics of LLM-generated Text?cited by 4
- 2024TRACE: TRansformer-based Attribution using Contrastive Embeddings in LLMscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.