mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Matching Features, Not Tokens: Energy-Based Fine-Tuning of Language Models

arXiv 2603.12248 ↗First posted 12 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cross-entropy (CE) training provides dense and scalable supervision for language models, but it optimizes next-token prediction under teacher forcing rather than sequence-level behavior under model rollouts. We introduce a feature-matching objective for language-model fine-tuning that targets sequence-level statistics of the completion distribution, providing dense semantic feedback without requiring a task-specific verifier or preference model. To optimize this objective efficiently, we propose energy-based fine-tuning (EBFT), which uses strided block-parallel sampling to generate multiple rollouts from nested prefixes concurrently, batches feature extraction over these rollouts, and uses the resulting embeddings to perform an on-policy policy-gradient update. We present a theoretical perspective connecting EBFT to KL-regularized feature-matching and energy-based modeling. Empirically, across Q&A coding, unstructured coding, and translation, EBFT matches RLVR and outperforms SFT on downstream accuracy while achieving a lower validation cross-entropy than both methods.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2026.

Builds on

32 of 44 references.

References · 32

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  5. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  6. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  7. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  8. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  9. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  10. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  11. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  12. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
20 more
  1. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 576
  2. 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 547
  3. 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translationcited by 394
  4. 2024Quiet-STaR: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Think Before Speakingcited by 301
  5. 2016Professor Forcing: A New Algorithm for Training Recurrent Networkscited by 216
  6. 2025Echo Chamber: RL Post-training Amplifies Behaviors Learned in Pretrainingcited by 129
  7. 2023A Paradigm Shift in Machine Translation: Boosting Translation Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 89
  8. 2024Energy-Based Diffusion Language Models for Text Generationcited by 89
  9. 2025OpenCodeInstruct: A Large-scale Instruction Tuning Dataset for Code LLMscited by 60
  10. 2017Classical Structured Prediction Losses for Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 55
  11. 2018MTNT: A Testbed for Machine Translation of Noisy Textcited by 54
  12. 2025Reinforcement Pre-Trainingcited by 40
  13. 2025FlowRL: Matching Reward Distributions for LLM Reasoningcited by 40
  14. 2019Calibration, Entropy Rates, and Memory in Language Modelscited by 32
  15. 2025RLP: Reinforcement as a Pretraining Objectivecited by 25
  16. 2025Reinforcement Learning on Pre-Training Datacited by 12
  17. 2021Dual Training of Energy-Based Models with Overparametrized Shallow Neural Networkscited by 8
  18. 2025Escaping the Verifier: Learning to Reason via Demonstrationscited by 7
  19. 2026Features as Rewards: Scalable Supervision for Open-Ended Tasks via Interpretabilitycited by 6
  20. 2025Generative Adversarial Post-Training Mitigates Reward Hacking in Live Human-AI Music Interactioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.