Features as Rewards: Scalable Supervision for Open-Ended Tasks via Interpretability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models trained on large-scale datasets have been shown to learn features that encode abstract concepts such as factuality or intent. Such features are traditionally used for test-time monitoring or steering. We present an alternative affordance: features as scalable supervision for open-ended tasks. We consider the case of hallucination-reduction as a desirable, yet open-ended behavior and design a reinforcement learning (RL) pipeline, titled RLFR (Reinforcement Learning from Feature Rewards), that uses features as reward functions. Grounded in a novel probing framework that identifies candidate hallucinated claims, our pipeline teaches a model to intervene and correct its completions when it is uncertain of their factuality. Furthermore, the pipeline enables scalable test-time compute, guided once more by our reward features. This end-to-end process operationalized on Gemma-3-12B-IT results in a policy that is 58% less likely to hallucinate compared to the original model (when run in tandem with our probing harness), while preserving performance on standard benchmarks. Taken together, by grounding supervision in the language of features, this paper introduces a novel paradigm in the use of interpretability for learning open-ended tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026What do Language Models Learn and When? The Implicit Curriculum Hypothesiscited by 8
- 2026Matching Features, Not Tokens: Energy-Based Fine-Tuning of Language Modelscited by 2
- 2026Breaking the Solver Bottleneck: Training Task Generators at the Learnable Frontiercited by 1
- 2026Who Do Language Models Think Is Competent? A Mechanistic Analysis of Occupational Biascited by 0
- 2026Alignment via Training Against Probes Without Losing Monitorabilitycited by 0
- 2026Alignment via Training Against Probes Without Losing Monitorability29 Sep 2026
- 2026Who Do Language Models Think Is Competent? A Mechanistic Analysis of Occupational Bias15 Jun 2026
- 2026Breaking the Solver Bottleneck: Training Task Generators at the Learnable Frontier10 Jun 2026
- 2026What do Language Models Learn and When? The Implicit Curriculum Hypothesis9 Apr 2026
- 2026Matching Features, Not Tokens: Energy-Based Fine-Tuning of Language Models12 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Learning to Reason for Hallucination Span Detection
- 2026Understanding the Role of Hallucination in Reinforcement Post-Training of Multimodal Reasoning Models
- 2025Train for Truth, Keep the Skills: Binary Retrieval-Augmented Reward Mitigates Hallucinations
- 2025Reasoning Models Hallucinate More: Factuality-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models
- 2026Sparse Feature Policy Unlearning Mitigates State Hallucination in Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2025KnowRL: Exploring Knowledgeable Reinforcement Learning for Factuality
- 2026DEEPO: Dual-Entropy Enhanced Policy Optimization for Hallucination in MLLMs
- 2026Hallucination Self-Play: Bootstrapping Reinforced Detector via Evolved Generator