mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

It's Enough: Relaxing Diagonal Constraints in Linear Autoencoders for Recommendation

arXiv 2305.12922 ↗First posted 22 May 2023cs.IR cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Linear autoencoder models learn an item-to-item weight matrix via convex optimization with L2 regularization and zero-diagonal constraints. Despite their simplicity, they have shown remarkable performance compared to sophisticated non-linear models. This paper aims to theoretically understand the properties of two terms in linear autoencoders. Through the lens of singular value decomposition (SVD) and principal component analysis (PCA), it is revealed that L2 regularization enhances the impact of high-ranked PCs. Meanwhile, zero-diagonal constraints reduce the impact of low-ranked PCs, leading to performance degradation for unpopular items. Inspired by this analysis, we propose simple-yet-effective linear autoencoder models using diagonal inequality constraints, called Relaxed Linear AutoEncoder (RLAE) and Relaxed Denoising Linear AutoEncoder (RDLAE). We prove that they generalize linear autoencoders by adjusting the degree of diagonal constraints. Experimental results demonstrate that our models are comparable or superior to state-of-the-art linear and non-linear models on six benchmark datasets; they significantly improve the accuracy of long-tail items. These results also support our theoretical insights on regularization and diagonal constraints in linear autoencoders.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2023.

Builds on

19 of 46 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018Self-Attentive Sequential Recommendationcited by 1,169
  2. 2020LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendationcited by 1,134
  3. 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,108
  4. 2019BERT4Rec: Sequential Recommendation with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformercited by 952
  5. 2019Neural Graph Collaborative Filteringcited by 660
  6. 2018Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative Filteringcited by 308
  7. 2017Neural Attentive Session-based Recommendationcited by 237
  8. 2019Are We Really Making Much Progress? A Worrying Analysis of Recent Neural Recommendation Approachescited by 181
  9. 2020Revisiting Graph based Collaborative Filtering: A Linear Residual Graph Convolutional Network Approachcited by 119
  10. 2019Embarrassingly Shallow Autoencoders for Sparse Datacited by 93
  11. 2019A Troubling Analysis of Reproducibility and Progress in Recommender Systems Researchcited by 65
  12. 2019RecVAE: a New Variational Autoencoder for Top-N Recommendations with Implicit Feedbackcited by 63
7 more
  1. 2021How Powerful is Graph Convolution for Recommendation?cited by 50
  2. 2019On the Difficulty of Evaluating Baselines: A Study on Recommender Systemscited by 46
  3. 2021LT-OCF: Learnable-Time ODE-based Collaborative Filteringcited by 21
  4. 2021Linear, or Non-Linear, That is the Question!cited by 19
  5. 2021Towards a Better Understanding of Linear Models for Recommendationcited by 18
  6. 2021Theoretical Understandings of Product Embedding for E-commerce Machine Learningcited by 4
  7. 2022Bilateral Self-unbiased Learning from Biased Implicit Feedbackcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

7 papers.