PAC-Bayes Bounds for Multivariate Linear Regression and Linear Autoencoders
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Linear Autoencoders (LAEs) have shown strong performance in state-of-the-art recommender systems. However, this success remains largely empirical, with limited theoretical understanding. In this paper, we investigate the generalizability -- a theoretical measure of model performance in statistical learning -- of multivariate linear regression and LAEs. We first propose a PAC-Bayes bound for multivariate linear regression, extending the earlier bound for single-output linear regression by Shalaeva et al., and establish sufficient conditions for its convergence. We then show that LAEs, when evaluated under a relaxed mean squared error, can be interpreted as constrained multivariate linear regression models on bounded data, to which our bound adapts. Furthermore, we develop theoretical methods to improve the computational efficiency of optimizing the LAE bound, enabling its practical evaluation on large models and real-world datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that our bound is tight and correlates well with practical ranking metrics such as Recall@K and NDCG@K.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2025.
Builds on
22 of 55 references.
References · 22
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 527
- 2018Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative Filteringcited by 308
- 2021Deep learning: a statistical viewpointcited by 239
- 2021User-friendly introduction to PAC-Bayes boundscited by 234
- 2019Uniform convergence may be unable to explain generalization in deep learningcited by 223
- 2019Are We Really Making Much Progress? A Worrying Analysis of Recent Neural Recommendation Approachescited by 181
- 2015On the properties of variational approximations of Gibbs posteriorscited by 121
- 2019Embarrassingly Shallow Autoencoders for Sparse Datacited by 93
- 2016PAC-Bayesian Theory Meets Bayesian Inferencecited by 87
- 2021SimpleX: A Simple and Strong Baseline for Collaborative Filteringcited by 65
- 2023Generalization Bounds: Perspectives from Information Theory and PAC-Bayescited by 60
10 more
- 2020PAC-Bayes unleashed: generalisation bounds with unbounded lossescited by 43
- 2022PAC-Bayes Generalisation Bounds for Heavy-Tailed Losses through Supermartingalescited by 23
- 2022On PAC-Bayesian reconstruction guarantees for VAEscited by 20
- 2021Towards a Better Understanding of Linear Models for Recommendationcited by 18
- 2023More PAC-Bayes bounds: From bounded losses, to losses with general tail behaviors, to anytime validitycited by 17
- 2019Improved PAC-Bayesian Bounds for Linear Regressioncited by 12
- 2024PAC-Bayes-Chernoff bounds for unbounded lossescited by 9
- 2013Bayesian methods for low-rank matrix estimation: short survey and theoretical studycited by 7
- 2022From bilinear regression to inductive matrix completion: a quasi-Bayesian analysiscited by 7
- 2023It's Enough: Relaxing Diagonal Constraints in Linear Autoencoders for Recommendationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.