mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Proactive Guiding Strategy for Item-side Fairness in Interactive Recommendation

arXiv 2603.03094 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2026cs.IR cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Item-side fairness is crucial for ensuring the fair exposure of long-tail items in interactive recommender systems. Existing approaches promote the exposure of long-tail items by directly incorporating them into recommended results. This causes misalignment between user preferences and the recommended long-tail items, which hinders long-term user engagement and reduces the effectiveness of recommendations. We aim for a proactive fairness-guiding strategy, which actively guides user preferences toward long-tail items while preserving user satisfaction during the interactive recommendation process. To this end, we propose HRL4PFG, an interactive recommendation framework that leverages hierarchical reinforcement learning to guide user preferences toward long-tail items progressively. HRL4PFG operates through a macro-level process that generates fairness-guided targets based on multi-step feedback, and a micro-level process that fine-tunes recommendations in real time according to both these targets and evolving user preferences. Extensive experiments show that HRL4PFG improves cumulative interaction rewards and maximum user interaction length by a larger margin when compared with state-of-the-art methods in interactive recommendation environments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.

Builds on

23 of 36 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  2. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  3. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
  4. 2017DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Predictioncited by 673
  5. 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 137
  6. 2019Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisonscited by 127
  7. 2022A Survey on the Fairness of Recommender Systemscited by 102
  8. 2020Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Reasoning for Eliminating Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemcited by 94
  9. 2022KuaiRec: A Fully-observed Dataset and Insights for Evaluating Recommender Systemscited by 94
  10. 2019Proactive Human-Machine Conversation with Explicit Conversation Goalscited by 87
  11. 2021Towards Long-term Fairness in Recommendationcited by 77
  12. 2019Policy Learning for Fairness in Rankingcited by 74
11 more
  1. 2022KuaiRand: An Unbiased Sequential Recommendation Dataset with Randomly Exposed Videoscited by 69
  2. 2019The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 68
  3. 2019Target-Guided Open-Domain Conversationcited by 66
  4. 2020Self-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Recommender Systemscited by 49
  5. 2022Preference Dynamics Under Personalized Recommendationscited by 25
  6. 2022Towards Psychologically-Grounded Dynamic Preference Modelscited by 8
  7. 2023Alleviating Video-Length Effect for Micro-video Recommendationcited by 8
  8. 2024EasyRL4Rec: An Easy-to-use Library for Reinforcement Learning Based Recommender Systemscited by 8
  9. 2024Proactive Recommendation with Iterative Preference Guidancecited by 5
  10. 2022Influential Recommender Systemcited by 2
  11. 2023Towards Hierarchical Policy Learning for Conversational Recommendation with Hypergraph-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.