Combinatorial Sparse PCA Beyond the Spiked Identity Model
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse PCA is one of the most well-studied problems in high-dimensional statistics. In this problem, we are given samples from a distribution with covariance Sigma, whose top eigenvector v ∈ Rd is s-sparse. Existing sparse PCA algorithms can be broadly categorized into (1) combinatorial algorithms (e.g., diagonal or elementwise covariance thresholding) and (2) SDP-based algorithms. While combinatorial algorithms are much simpler, they are typically only analyzed under the spiked identity model (where Sigma = Id + γ vv^top for some γ > 0), whereas SDP-based algorithms require no additional assumptions on Sigma. We demonstrate explicit counterexample covariances Sigma against the success of standard combinatorial algorithms for sparse PCA, when moving beyond the spiked identity model. In light of this discrepancy, we give the first combinatorial method for sparse PCA that provably succeeds for general Sigma using s2 · polylog(d) samples and d2 · poly(s, log(d)) time, by providing a global convergence guarantee on a variant of the truncated power method of Yuan and Zhang (2013). We provide a natural generalization of our method to recovering a vector in a sparse leading eigenspace. Finally, we evaluate our method on synthetic and real-world sparse PCA datasets.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.
Builds on
27 of 60 references.
References · 27
- 2016Learning from Untrusted Datacited by 90
- 2019Subexponential-Time Algorithms for Sparse PCAcited by 41
- 2021Solving SDP Faster: A Robust IPM Framework and Efficient Implementationcited by 33
- 2019Computational Hardness of Certifying Bounds on Constrained PCA Problemscited by 30
- 2024More Asymmetry Yields Faster Matrix Multiplicationcited by 27
- 2014Statistical and computational trade-offs in estimation of sparse principal componentscited by 26
- 2014Sparse CCA: Adaptive Estimation and Computational Barrierscited by 25
- 2013Sparse PCA via Covariance Thresholdingcited by 22
- 2016LazySVD: Even Faster SVD Decomposition Yet Without Agonizing Paincited by 22
- 2022Semi-Random Sparse Recovery in Nearly-Linear Timecited by 18
- 2018Non-Convex Matrix Completion Against a Semi-Random Adversarycited by 9
- 2024Oja's Algorithm for Streaming Sparse PCAcited by 9
15 more
- 2015NP-Hardness and Inapproximability of Sparse PCAcited by 8
- 2023Dueling Optimization with a Monotone Adversarycited by 8
- 2024Black-Box k-to-1-PCA Reductions: Theory and Applicationscited by 7
- 2018Sparse PCA from Sparse Linear Regressioncited by 6
- 2022Sparse PCA: a Geometric Approachcited by 6
- 2022Algorithms approaching the threshold for semi-random planted cliquecited by 6
- 2019Gradient-based Sparse Principal Component Analysis with Extensions to Online Learningcited by 5
- 2023Structured Semidefinite Programming for Recovering Structured Preconditionerscited by 5
- 2024Semirandom Planted Clique and the Restricted Isometry Propertycited by 5
- 2025Learning Noisy Halfspaces with a Margin: Massart is No Harder than Randomcited by 5
- 2017Sparse principal component analysis and its l1-relaxationcited by 4
- 2024Efficient Sparse PCA via Block-Diagonalizationcited by 4
- 2020A New Basis for Sparse Principal Component Analysiscited by 2
- 2023Sparse PCA Beyond Covariance Thresholdingcited by 2
- 2024On the Robustness of Spectral Algorithms for Semirandom Stochastic Block Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.