mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Semi-Random Sparse Recovery in Nearly-Linear Time

arXiv 2203.04002 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2022cs.DS cs.LG math.OCcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse recovery is one of the most fundamental and well-studied inverse problems. Standard statistical formulations of the problem are provably solved by general convex programming techniques and more practical, fast (nearly-linear time) iterative methods. However, these latter "fast algorithms" have previously been observed to be brittle in various real-world settings. We investigate the brittleness of fast sparse recovery algorithms to generative model changes through the lens of studying their robustness to a "helpful" semi-random adversary, a framework which tests whether an algorithm overfits to input assumptions. We consider the following basic model: let A ∈ ℝn × d be a measurement matrix which contains an unknown subset of rows G ∈ ℝm × d which are bounded and satisfy the restricted isometry property (RIP), but is otherwise arbitrary. Letting x^star ∈ ℝd be s-sparse, and given either exact measurements b = A x^star or noisy measurements b = A x^star + xi, we design algorithms recovering x^star information-theoretically optimally in nearly-linear time. We extend our algorithm to hold for weaker generative models relaxing our planted RIP assumption to a natural weighted variant, and show that our method's guarantees naturally interpolate the quality of the measurement matrix to, in some parameter regimes, run in sublinear time. Our approach differs from prior fast iterative methods with provable guarantees under semi-random generative models: natural conditions on a submatrix which make sparse recovery tractable are NP-hard to verify. We design a new iterative method tailored to the geometry of sparse recovery which is provably robust to our semi-random model. We hope our approach opens the door to new robust, efficient algorithms for natural statistical inverse problems.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2022.

Builds on

20 of 89 references.

References · 20

  1. 2019Distribution-Independent PAC Learning of Halfspaces with Massart Noisecited by 54
  2. 2014On Iterative Hard Thresholding Methods for High-dimensional M-Estimationcited by 53
  3. 2020Learning Halfspaces with Massart Noise Under Structured Distributionscited by 45
  4. 2016Geometric Median in Nearly Linear Timecited by 38
  5. 2020Solving Tall Dense Linear Programs in Nearly Linear Timecited by 21
  6. 2015How Robust are Reconstruction Thresholds for Community Detection?cited by 20
  7. 2021Improved Algorithms for Efficient Active Learning Halfspaces with Massart and Tsybakov noisecited by 18
  8. 2021Forster Decomposition and Learning Halfspaces with Noisecited by 16
  9. 2021On the Power of Preconditioning in Sparse Linear Regressioncited by 15
  10. 2020Classification Under Misspecification: Halfspaces, Generalized Linear Models, and Connections to Evolvabilitycited by 13
  11. 2014On the Prediction Performance of the Lassocited by 12
  12. 2021Boosting in the Presence of Massart Noisecited by 10
8 more
  1. 2021ReLU Regression with Massart Noisecited by 10
  2. 2015Optimal prediction for sparse linear models? Lower bounds for coordinate-separable M-estimatorscited by 9
  3. 2018Non-Convex Matrix Completion Against a Semi-Random Adversarycited by 9
  4. 2015Learning Communities in the Presence of Errorscited by 7
  5. 2014Constant Factor Approximation for Balanced Cut in the PIE modelcited by 3
  6. 2014Tight Error Bounds for Structured Predictioncited by 2
  7. 2018Towards Learning Sparsely Used Dictionaries with Arbitrary Supportscited by 2
  8. 2014Exploiting Prior Knowledge in Compressed Sensing Wireless ECG Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

18 papers.

Sort: