mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sparse PCA Beyond Covariance Thresholding

arXiv 2302.10158 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the Wishart model for sparse PCA we are given n samples Y1,ldots, Yn drawn independently from a d-dimensional Gaussian distribution N(0, Id + β vv^top), where β > 0 and v∈ ℝd is a k-sparse unit vector, and we wish to recover v (up to sign). We show that if n ≥ Omega(d), then for every t ll k there exists an algorithm running in time n· dO(t) that solves this problem as long as [ β gtrsim frack√nt√ln(2 + td/k2),. ] Prior to this work, the best polynomial time algorithm in the regime k≈ √d, called Covariance Thresholding (proposed in [KNV15a] and analyzed in [DM14]), required β gtrsim frack√n√ln(2 + d/k2). For large enough constant t our algorithm runs in polynomial time and has better guarantees than Covariance Thresholding. Previously known algorithms with such guarantees required quasi-polynomial time dO(log d). In addition, we show that our techniques work with sparse PCA with adversarial perturbations studied in [dKNS20]. This model generalizes not only sparse PCA, but also other problems studied in prior works, including the sparse planted vector problem. As a consequence, we provide polynomial time algorithms for the sparse planted vector problem that have better guarantees than the state of the art in some regimes. Our approach also works with the Wigner model for sparse PCA. Moreover, we show that it is possible to combine our techniques with recent results on sparse PCA with symmetric heavy-tailed noise [dNNS22]. In particular, in the regime k ≈ √d we get the first polynomial time algorithm that works with symmetric heavy-tailed noise, while the algorithm from [dNNS22]. requires quasi-polynomial time in these settings.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2023.

Builds on

25 of 36 references.

References · 25

  1. 2019Notes on Computational Hardness of Hypothesis Testing: Predictions using the Low-Degree Likelihood Ratiocited by 85
  2. 2020Statistical Query Algorithms and Low-Degree Tests Are Almost Equivalentcited by 51
  3. 2019Subexponential-Time Algorithms for Sparse PCAcited by 41
  4. 2015Fast spectral algorithms from sum-of-squares proofs: tensor decomposition and planted sparse vectorscited by 38
  5. 2018Reducibility and Computational Lower Bounds for Problems with Planted Sparse Structurecited by 35
  6. 2014Statistical and computational trade-offs in estimation of sparse principal componentscited by 26
  7. 2014Sparse CCA: Adaptive Estimation and Computational Barrierscited by 25
  8. 2021Lattice-Based Methods Surpass Sum-of-Squares in Clusteringcited by 25
  9. 2013Sparse PCA via Covariance Thresholdingcited by 22
  10. 2021Optimal Spectral Recovery of a Planted Vector in a Subspacecited by 21
  11. 2020Sparse PCA: Algorithms, Adversarial Perturbations and Certificatescited by 18
  12. 2021Non-Gaussian Component Analysis via Lattice Basis Reductioncited by 14
13 more
  1. 2019Optimal Average-Case Reductions to Sparse PCA: From Weak Assumptions to Strong Hardnesscited by 13
  2. 2020Finding the Sparsest Vectors in a Subspace: Theory, Algorithms, and Applicationscited by 13
  3. 2013Computational Lower Bounds for Sparse PCAcited by 11
  4. 2013Rounding Sum-of-Squares Relaxationscited by 11
  5. 2015Sum-of-Squares Lower Bounds for Sparse PCAcited by 10
  6. 2013Do semidefinite relaxations solve sparse PCA up to the information limit?cited by 9
  7. 2020The Average-Case Time Complexity of Certifying the Restricted Isometry Propertycited by 9
  8. 2020Free Energy Wells and Overlap Gap Property in Sparse PCAcited by 9
  9. 2013Scaling Law for Recovering the Sparsest Element in a Subspacecited by 8
  10. 2022Higher degree sum-of-squares relaxations robust against oblivious outlierscited by 6
  11. 2019A greedy anytime algorithm for sparse PCAcited by 5
  12. 2020The Strongish Planted Clique Hypothesis and Its Consequencescited by 5
  13. 2023SQ Lower Bounds for Random Sparse Planted Vector Problemcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.