mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Graph-Based Self-Healing Tool Routing for Cost-Efficient LLM Agents

arXiv 2603.01548 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2026cs.AI cs.SEcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Tool-using LLM agents face a reliability-cost tradeoff: routing every decision through the LLM improves correctness but incurs high latency and inference cost, while pre-coded workflow graphs reduce cost but become brittle under unanticipated compound tool failures. We present Self-Healing Router, a fault-tolerant orchestration architecture that treats most agent control-flow decisions as routing rather than reasoning. The system combines (i) parallel health monitors that assign priority scores to runtime conditions such as tool outages and risk signals, and (ii) a cost-weighted tool graph where Dijkstra's algorithm performs deterministic shortest-path routing. When a tool fails mid-execution, its edges are reweighted to infinity and the path is recomputed -- yielding automatic recovery without invoking the LLM. The LLM is reserved exclusively for cases where no feasible path exists, enabling goal demotion or escalation. Prior graph-based tool-use systems (ControlLLM, ToolNet, NaviAgent) focus on tool selection and planning; our contribution is runtime fault tolerance with deterministic recovery and binary observability -- every failure is either a logged reroute or an explicit escalation, never a silent skip. Across 19 scenarios spanning three graph topologies (linear pipeline, dependency DAG, parallel fan-out), Self-Healing Router matches ReAct's correctness while reducing control-plane LLM calls by 93% (9 vs 123 aggregate) and eliminating the silent-failure cases observed in a well-engineered static workflow baseline under compound failures.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2026.

Builds on

7 of 13 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SHIELDA: Structured Handling of Exceptions in LLM-Driven Agentic Workflows11 Aug

Other references · 6

  1. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  2. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
  3. 2023Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Modelscited by 551
  4. 2023ControlLLM: Augment Language Models with Tools by Searching on Graphscited by 59
  5. 2023Synergistic Integration of Large Language Models and Cognitive Architectures for Robust AI: An Exploratory Analysiscited by 11
  6. 2025Adaptive routing protocols for determining optimal paths in AI multi-agent systems: a priority- and learning-enhanced approachcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026When Tools Fail: Benchmarking Dynamic Replanning and Anomaly Recovery in LLM Agents
  2. 2026MeshHeal: Two-Timescale Self-Healing for Gray Failures in Decentralized LLM Agent Networks
  3. 2026Self-Healing Agentic Orchestrators for Reliable Tool-Augmented Large Language Model Systems
  4. 2026PeakBench: Benchmarking Resource-Aware Tool Invocation in LLM Agents
  5. 2026Tool-Making and Self-Evolving LLM Agents in Low-Latency Systems
  6. 2026Robust and Efficient Tool Orchestration via Layered Execution Structures with Reflective Correction
  7. 2026AgentTether: Graph-Guided Diagnosis and Runtime Intervention for Reliable LLM Agent Operation
  8. 2026PlanBench-XL: Evaluating Long-Horizon Planning of LLM Tool-Use Agents in Large-Scale Tool Ecosystems