Robust and Efficient Tool Orchestration via Layered Execution Structures with Reflective Correction
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Tool learning and function calling
Abstract (arXiv)
Tool invocation is a core capability of agentic systems, yet failures often arise not from individual tool calls but from how multiple tools are organized and executed together. Existing approaches tightly couple tool execution with stepwise language reasoning or explicit planning, leading to brittle behavior and high execution overhead. To overcome these limitations, we revisit tool invocation from the perspective of tool orchestration. Our key insight is that effective orchestration does not require precise dependency graphs or fine-grained planning. Instead, a coarse-grained layer structure suffices to provide global guidance, while execution-time errors can be corrected locally. Specifically, we model tool orchestration as learning a layered execution structure that captures high-level tool dependencies, inducing layer-wise execution through context constraints. To handle execution-time failures, we introduce a schema-aware reflective correction mechanism that detects and repairs errors locally. This design confines errors to individual tool calls and avoids re-planning entire execution trajectories. This structured execution paradigm enables a lightweight and reusable orchestration component for agentic systems. Experimental results show that our approach achieves robust tool execution while reducing execution complexity and overhead. Code will be made publicly available.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Tool learning and function calling, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 29 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2026.
Builds on
29 of 34 references.
Closest ancestors · 10
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Beyond ReAct: A Planner-Centric Framework for Complex Tool-Augmented LLM Reasoning13 Nov
- 2025Divide-Then-Aggregate: An Efficient Tool Learning Method via Parallel Tool Invocation21 Jan
- 2024StableToolBench: Towards Stable Large-Scale Benchmarking on Tool Learning of Large Language Models12 Mar
- 2024TOOLVERIFIER: Generalization to New Tools via Self-Verification21 Feb
- 2024AnyTool: Self-Reflective, Hierarchical Agents for Large-Scale API Calls6 Feb
- 2023MetaTool Benchmark for Large Language Models: Deciding Whether to Use Tools and Which to Use4 Oct
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs31 Jul
- 2023ToolAlpaca: Generalized Tool Learning for Language Models with 3000 Simulated Cases8 Jun
- 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs24 May
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools9 Feb
Other references · 19
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
- 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,173
- 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Modelscited by 550
- 2023Chameleon: Plug-and-Play Compositional Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 352
- 2025Small Language Models are the Future of Agentic AIcited by 254
- 2023ReWOO: Decoupling Reasoning from Observations for Efficient Augmented Language Modelscited by 174
- 2023An LLM Compiler for Parallel Function Callingcited by 170
- 2024Same Task, More Tokens: the Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 150
- 2019Rank consistent ordinal regression for neural networks with application to age estimationcited by 132
7 more
- 2025Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failurescited by 118
- 2023ToolChain*: Efficient Action Space Navigation in Large Language Models with A* Searchcited by 103
- 2024Small LLMs Are Weak Tool Learners: A Multi-LLM Agentcited by 92
- 2024ToolGen: Unified Tool Retrieval and Calling via Generationcited by 72
- 2024Can Graph Learning Improve Planning in LLM-based Agents?cited by 42
- 2024Advancing Tool-Augmented Large Language Models: Integrating Insights from Errors in Inference Treescited by 38
- 2025GAP: Graph-Based Agent Planning with Parallel Tool Use and Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026GraphBit: A Graph-based Agentic Framework for Non-Linear Agent Orchestration
- 2026ToolMisuseBench: An Offline Deterministic Benchmark for Tool Misuse and Recovery in Agentic Systems
- 2026Self-Healing Agentic Orchestrators for Reliable Tool-Augmented Large Language Model Systems
- 2025AgentGuard: Repurposing Agentic Orchestrator for Safety Evaluation of Tool Orchestration
- 2026Beyond Function Calling: Benchmarking Tool-Using Agents under Tool-Environment Unreliability
- 2026PeakBench: Benchmarking Resource-Aware Tool Invocation in LLM Agents
- 2026Callability Is Not Operability: Controlled Interface Interventions for LLM Agents
- 2026When Tools Fail: Benchmarking Dynamic Replanning and Anomaly Recovery in LLM Agents