AgentTether: Graph-Guided Diagnosis and Runtime Intervention for Reliable LLM Agent Operation
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly used for multi-step, stateful tool-use tasks, yet production reliability remains limited. Unlike static software repair, agent repair must recover dynamic trajectories whose early decisions can propagate into later errors and external state changes. Existing automatic remedies address only part of this problem: blind retry adds no diagnosis, outcome feedback says whether a run failed but not where or why, and self-reflection often lacks grounded evidence to prevent the same failure from recurring. We present AgentTether, a run-time repair framework that automates post-run diagnosis and guided recovery without modifying the underlying agent or environment. AgentTether abstracts each run into Transition Units, links them through a dependency-aware Critical Transition Graph, and localizes failure-critical subtrajectories by combining an offline normal-behavior model with a run-local graph detector. It then converts the localized cause into behavior-scoped guidance backed by cross-iteration Repair Memory, and can optionally apply guarded run-time intervention to keep the correction active during re-execution. The same design can be deployed as an offline diagnostic-and-guidance tool or as an online repair layer. We evaluate AgentTether on 261 tau-bench tasks across three domains with Qwen3.7-max, and test cross-model transfer on Banking with GPT-5.4. On the hardest Banking domain, AgentTether repairs 59.04% (49/83) of initially failed Qwen3.7-max tasks and 65.12% (56/86) of initially failed GPT-5.4 tasks. Overall, AgentTether improves repair effectiveness while reducing agent turns and end-to-end approach tokens, suggesting a practical reliability layer that can wrap existing agent deployments, reduce wasted re-execution, and improve recovery without retraining the agent.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 34 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2026.
Builds on
34 of 46 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systems30 Apr
- 2025SWE-smith: Scaling Data for Software Engineering Agents30 Apr
- 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?17 Mar
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering6 May
Other references · 30
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
18 more
- 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,302
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
- 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Modelscited by 1,057
- 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
- 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 963
- 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 877
- 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
- 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 751
- 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 628
- 2026Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfacescited by 515
- 2023Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandboxcited by 514
- 2023Language Models can Solve Computer Taskscited by 371
- 2024When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMscited by 230
- 2024AI Agents That Mattercited by 199
- 2022Practical Program Repair in the Era of Large Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 133
- 2017Survey on Models and Techniques for Root-Cause Analysiscited by 15
- 2026Debugging the Debuggers: Failure-Anchored Structured Recovery for Software Engineering Agentscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Repair or Resample? Rethinking Failure Debugging in LLM Multi-Agent Systemscited by 3
- 2026Real-Time Detection and Repair of LLM Agent Failurescited by 2
- 2026EvoSteer: Online Self-Evolving Graph Orchestration via Reference-Anchored Credit Assignmentcited by 0
- 2026What Can Component-Replacement Evidence Establish? A Critical Scoping Review of Local Decisions in LLM Agentscited by 0
- 2026What Can Component-Replacement Evidence Establish? A Critical Scoping Review of Local Decisions in LLM Agents30 Sep 2026
- 2026EvoSteer: Online Self-Evolving Graph Orchestration via Reference-Anchored Credit Assignment29 Sep 2026
- 2026Repair or Resample? Rethinking Failure Debugging in LLM Multi-Agent Systems26 Aug 2026
- 2026Real-Time Detection and Repair of LLM Agent Failures3 Aug 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Diagnosis-Driven Automatic Repair for Agentic Workflow via Symbolic Inference
- 2026AgentFixer: From Failure Detection to Fix Recommendations in LLM Agentic Systems
- 2026ParaRecover: A Process-Level Benchmark for Error Localization and Recovery in Parallel Tool-Use Agents
- 2026When Tools Fail: Benchmarking Dynamic Replanning and Anomaly Recovery in LLM Agents
- 2026TraceCoder: A Trace-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Debugging of LLM-Generated Code
- 2026One Readout, Many Repairs: Diffusion-Guided Hierarchical Search for Tool-Agent Repair
- 2026AgentDebugX: An Open-Source Toolkit for Failure Observability, Attribution, and Recovery in LLM Agents
- 2025InspectCoder: Dynamic Analysis-Enabled Self Repair through interactive LLM-Debugger Collaboration