mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ProtoDCS: Towards Robust and Efficient Open-Set Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2602.23653 ↗First posted 27 Feb 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale Vision-Language Models (VLMs) exhibit strong zero-shot recognition, yet their real-world deployment is challenged by distribution shifts. While Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) can mitigate this, existing VLM-based TTA methods operate under a closed-set assumption, failing in open-set scenarios where test streams contain both covariate-shifted in-distribution (csID) and out-of-distribution (csOOD) data. This leads to a critical difficulty: the model must discriminate unknown csOOD samples to avoid interference while simultaneously adapting to known csID classes for accuracy. Current open-set TTA (OSTTA) methods rely on hard thresholds for separation and entropy minimization for adaptation. These strategies are brittle, often misclassifying ambiguous csOOD samples and inducing overconfident predictions, and their parameter-update mechanism is computationally prohibitive for VLMs. To address these limitations, we propose Prototype-based Double-Check Separation (ProtoDCS), a robust framework for OSTTA that effectively separates csID and csOOD samples, enabling safe and efficient adaptation of VLMs to csID data. Our main contributions are: (1) a novel double-check separation mechanism employing probabilistic Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) verification to replace brittle thresholding; and (2) an evidence-driven adaptation strategy utilizing uncertainty-aware loss and efficient prototype-level updates, mitigating overconfidence and reducing computational overhead. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10/100-C and Tiny-ImageNet-C demonstrate that ProtoDCS achieves state-of-the-art performance, significantly boosting both known-class accuracy and OOD detection metrics. Code will be available at https://github.com/O-YangF/ProtoDCS.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 48 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2026.

Builds on

48 of 64 references.

Closest ancestors · 16

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025CLIPTTA: Robust Contrastive Vision-Language Test-Time Adaptation18 Jul
  2. 2025Free on the Fly: Enhancing Flexibility in Test-Time Adaptation with Online EM9 Jul
  3. 2025Unleashing the Potential of All Test Samples: Mean-Shift Guided Test-Time Adaptation1 Jul
  4. 2025O-TPT: Orthogonality Constraints for Calibrating Test-time Prompt Tuning in Vision-Language Models15 Mar
  5. 2025Bayesian Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models12 Mar
  6. 2025Realistic Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models7 Jan
  7. 2024BoostAdapter: Improving Vision-Language Test-Time Adaptation via Regional Bootstrapping20 Oct
  8. 2024Dual Prototype Evolving for Test-Time Generalization of Vision-Language Models16 Oct
  9. 2024On the test-time zero-shot generalization of vision-language models: Do we really need prompt learning?3 May
  10. 2024CLIPArTT: Adaptation of CLIP to New Domains at Test Time1 May
  11. 2024Efficient Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models27 Mar
  12. 2024C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersion21 Mar
4 more
  1. 2024An Empirical Study Into What Matters for Calibrating Vision-Language Models12 Feb
  2. 2023Diverse Data Augmentation with Diffusions for Effective Test-time Prompt Tuning11 Aug
  3. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models15 Sep
  4. 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapters9 Oct

Other references · 32

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  3. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  4. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  6. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  7. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  8. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  9. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  10. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  11. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
  12. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
20 more
  1. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
  2. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,265
  3. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
  4. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
  5. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
  6. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
  7. 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 258
  8. 2018Reducing Network Agnostophobiacited by 165
  9. 2024Entropy is not Enough for Test-Time Adaptation: From the Perspective of Disentangled Factorscited by 106
  10. 2023AdaNPC: Exploring Non-Parametric Classifier for Test-Time Adaptationcited by 48
  11. 2023Towards Open-Set Test-Time Adaptation Utilizing the Wisdom of Crowds in Entropy Minimizationcited by 39
  12. 2024COME: Test-time adaption by Conservatively Minimizing Entropycited by 31
  13. 2024Robust Calibration of Large Vision-Language Adapterscited by 28
  14. 2023TEA: Test-time Energy Adaptationcited by 25
  15. 2024Protected Test-Time Adaptation via Online Entropy Matching: A Betting Approachcited by 22
  16. 2024TAPT: Test-Time Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Robust Inference in Vision-Language Modelscited by 22
  17. 2024Uncertainty-Calibrated Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 20
  18. 2024STAMP: Outlier-Aware Test-Time Adaptation with Stable Memory Replaycited by 13
  19. 2025Effortless Active Labeling for Long-Term Test-Time Adaptationcited by 7
  20. 2025Exploring Audio Cues for Enhanced Test-Time Video Model Adaptationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Prototype-Based Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
  2. 2024Frustratingly Easy Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025The Illusion of Progress? A Critical Look at Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025Class-Aware Prototype Learning with Negative Contrast for Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025Advancing Reliable Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models under Visual Variations
  6. 2025Ultra-Light Test-Time Adaptation for Vision--Language Models
  7. 2026From Inference to Adaptation: A Unified Optimal Transport View of Vision Language Model
  8. 2026Efficient Test-time Adaptation through Candidate Verification and Divergence Shifts