mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Inference to Adaptation: A Unified Optimal Transport View of Vision Language Model

arXiv 2608.18339 ↗First posted 18 Aug 2026cs.CV cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable zero-shot capabilities yet remain sensitive to real-world distribution shifts during inference. Although significant efforts are devoted to adapting VLMs at test time, they rely heavily on noisy pseudo-labels predicted directly from raw embedding similarities during inference, which are unreliable under distribution shift and mislead the adaptation. To avoid noise amplification, existing works craft coarse-grained surrogate objectives during adaptation, which fail to explicitly model sample-level relationships across different modalities, creating objective mismatch with inference, thus leading to marginal performance improvement. In this work, we aim to bridge the detached objectives of inference and adaptation for VLMs, and propose a principled VLM TTA method called algname. For VLM inference, we formulate the zero-shot image classification task as a cross-modal alignment problem encoded via a Wasserstein OT formulation, providing robust pseudo-labels at the sample-level to effectively adapt VLMs. For VLM adaptation, we adopt a soft-label InfoNCE loss to adapt VLMs based on the OT-induced pseudo-labels, leveraging fine-grained supervisions to explicitly model relationships of individual image-text pairs via contrastive learning, which empowers accurate inference at the same granularity. Moreover, we theoretically reveal that the InfoNCE loss can be neatly reformulated as a Wasserstein OT formulation, thereby unifying the objectives of the inference and adaptation of VLMs to achieve their mutual benefits. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our methods, outperforming the best-performing methods by up to 7% with state-of-the-art efficiency.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 24 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.

Builds on

24 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 13

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Enhancing CLIP Robustness via Cross-Modality Alignment28 Oct
  2. 2025Mint: A Simple Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models against Common Corruptions25 Oct
  3. 2025The Illusion of Progress? A Critical Look at Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models30 Jun
  4. 2025Prompt-OT: An Optimal Transport Regularization Paradigm for Knowledge Preservation in Vision-Language Model Adaptation11 Mar
  5. 2025DynaPrompt: Dynamic Test-Time Prompt Tuning27 Jan
  6. 2024Efficient and Context-Aware Label Propagation for Zero-/Few-Shot Training-Free Adaptation of Vision-Language Model24 Dec
  7. 2024WATT: Weight Average Test-Time Adaptation of CLIP19 Jun
  8. 2024Frustratingly Easy Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models28 May
  9. 2024A Lost Opportunity for Vision-Language Models: A Comparative Study of Online Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models23 May
  10. 2024Efficient Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models27 Mar
  11. 2024Dual Memory Networks: A Versatile Adaptation Approach for Vision-Language Models26 Mar
  12. 2024Bridge the Modality and Capability Gaps in Vision-Language Model Selection20 Mar
1 more
  1. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models15 Sep

Other references · 11

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  3. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  4. 2021Image Segmentation Using Text and Image Promptscited by 512
  5. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 377
  6. 2023Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 189
  7. 2020Graph Optimal Transport for Cross-Domain Alignmentcited by 103
  8. 2024textttBATCLIP: Bimodal Online Test-Time Adaptation for CLIPcited by 11
  9. 2025Joint Optimal Transport and Embedding for Network Alignmentcited by 10
  10. 2025PLANETALIGN: A Comprehensive Python Library for Benchmarking Network Alignmentcited by 10
  11. 2025Pre-training CLIP against Data Poisoning with Optimal Transport-based Matching and Alignmentcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Adapting Vision-Language Models Without Labels: A Comprehensive Survey
  2. 2025Realistic Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
  3. 2023A Closer Look at the Few-Shot Adaptation of Large Vision-Language Models
  4. 2026ProtoDCS: Towards Robust and Efficient Open-Set Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026One Stone, Three Birds: Self-adaptive Optimal Transport for Multi-VLM Selection, Adaptation, and Ensembling
  6. 2025Beyond Retraining: Training-Free Unknown Class Filtering for Source-Free Open Set Domain Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
  7. 2025Advancing Reliable Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models under Visual Variations
  8. 2025Vision-Language Model Selection and Reuse for Downstream Adaptation