Benchmarking the Effects of Object Pose Estimation and Reconstruction on Robotic Grasping Success
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
3D reconstruction serves as the foundational layer for numerous robotic perception tasks, including 6D object pose estimation and grasp pose generation. Modern 3D reconstruction methods for objects can produce visually and geometrically impressive meshes from multi-view images, yet standard geometric evaluations do not reflect how reconstruction quality influences downstream tasks such as robotic manipulation performance. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a large-scale, physics-based benchmark that evaluates 6D pose estimators and 3D mesh models based on their functional efficacy in grasping. We analyze the impact of model fidelity by generating grasps on various reconstructed 3D meshes and executing them on the ground-truth model, simulating how grasp poses generated with an imperfect model affect interaction with the real object. This assesses the combined impact of pose error, grasp robustness, and geometric inaccuracies from 3D reconstruction. Our results show that reconstruction artifacts significantly decrease the number of grasp pose candidates but have a negligible effect on grasping performance given an accurately estimated pose. Our results also reveal that the relationship between grasp success and pose error is dominated by spatial error, and even a simple translation error provides insight into the success of the grasping pose of symmetric objects. This work provides insight into how perception systems relate to object manipulation using robots.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2026.
Builds on
16 of 27 references.
References · 16
- 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,698
- 2021NeuS: Learning Neural Implicit Surfaces by Volume Rendering for Multi-view Reconstructioncited by 1,701
- 2021Volume Rendering of Neural Implicit Surfacescited by 990
- 2017PoseCNN: A Convolutional Neural Network for 6D Object Pose Estimation in Cluttered Scenescited by 768
- 2021UNISURF: Unifying Neural Implicit Surfaces and Radiance Fields for Multi-View Reconstructioncited by 643
- 2023Nerfstudio: A Modular Framework for Neural Radiance Field Developmentcited by 596
- 2022MonoSDF: Exploring Monocular Geometric Cues for Neural Implicit Surface Reconstructioncited by 467
- 2023Neuralangelo: High-Fidelity Neural Surface Reconstructioncited by 464
- 2023FoundationPose: Unified 6D Pose Estimation and Tracking of Novel Objectscited by 411
- 2019DenseFusion: 6D Object Pose Estimation by Iterative Dense Fusioncited by 352
- 2017Dex-Net 2.0: Deep Learning to Plan Robust Grasps with Synthetic Point Clouds and Analytic Grasp Metricscited by 259
- 2018BOP: Benchmark for 6D Object Pose Estimationcited by 254
4 more
- 2023BakedSDF: Meshing Neural SDFs for Real-Time View Synthesiscited by 220
- 2015Supersizing Self-supervision: Learning to Grasp from 50K Tries and 700 Robot Hourscited by 208
- 2022MegaPose: 6D Pose Estimation of Novel Objects via Render & Comparecited by 198
- 2024Comparative Evaluation of 3D Reconstruction Methods for Object Pose Estimationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.