mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MerkleSpeech: Public-Key Verifiable, Chunk-Localised Speech Provenance via Perceptual Fingerprints and Merkle Commitments

arXiv 2602.10166 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2026cs.CR cs.SD eess.AScited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

Speech provenance goes beyond detecting whether a watermark is present. Real workflows involve splicing, quoting, trimming, and platform-level transforms that may preserve some regions while altering others. Neural watermarking systems have made strides in robustness and localised detection, but most deployments produce outputs with no third-party verifiable cryptographic proof tying a time segment to an issuer-signed original. Provenance standards like C2PA adopt signed manifests and Merkle-based fragment validation, yet their bindings target encoded assets and break under re-encoding or routine processing. We propose MerkleSpeech, a system for public-key verifiable, chunk-localised speech provenance offering two tiers of assurance. The first, a robust watermark attribution layer (WM-only), survives common distribution transforms and answers "was this chunk issued by a known party?". The second, a strict cryptographic integrity layer (MSv1), verifies Merkle inclusion of the chunk's fingerprint under an issuer signature. The system computes perceptual fingerprints over short speech chunks, commits them in a Merkle tree whose root is signed with an issuer key, and embeds a compact in-band watermark payload carrying a random content identifier and chunk metadata sufficient to retrieve Merkle inclusion proofs from a repository. Once the payload is extracted, all subsequent verification steps (signature check, fingerprint recomputation, Merkle inclusion) use only public information. The result is a splice-aware timeline indicating which regions pass each tier and why any given region fails. We describe the protocol, provide pseudocode, and present experiments targeting very low false positive rates under resampling, bandpass filtering, and additive noise, informed by recent audits identifying neural codecs as a major stressor for post-hoc audio watermarks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 10 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.

Builds on

10 of 26 references.

References · 10

  1. 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,905
  2. 2024Proactive Detection of Voice Cloning with Localized Watermarkingcited by 78
  3. 2023WavMark: Watermarking for Audio Generationcited by 50
  4. 2023Detecting Voice Cloning Attacks via Timbre Watermarkingcited by 44
  5. 2024SilentCipher: Deep Audio Watermarkingcited by 21
  6. 2025A Comprehensive Real-World Assessment of Audio Watermarking Algorithms: Will They Survive Neural Codecs?cited by 13
  7. 2024Interoperable Provenance Authentication of Broadcast Media using Open Standards-based Metadata, Watermarking and Cryptographycited by 6
  8. 2023Puppy: A Publicly Verifiable Watermarking Protocolcited by 2
  9. 2025SpeechVerifier: Robust Acoustic Fingerprint against Tampering Attacks via Watermarkingcited by 2
  10. 2025WAKE: Watermarking Audio with Key Enrichmentcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The Watermark Shortcut: How Provenance Marking Sabotages Audio Deepfake Detection
  2. 2026TextSeal: A Localized LLM Watermark for Provenance & Distillation Protection
  3. 2026VOW: Verifiable and Oblivious Watermark Detection for Large Language Models
  4. 2026Watermarks and Fingerprints as Soft Bindings for Content Provenance: An Open-Licence Benchmark for Images, Audio and Video
  5. 2026MelShield: Robust Mel-Domain Audio Watermarking for Provenance Attribution of AI Generated Synthesized Speech
  6. 2025Protecting Your Voice: Temporal-aware Robust Watermarking
  7. 2026Tracing Provenance and Detecting Tampering with Complementary LLM Watermarks
  8. 2026Combining Self-Embedding Audio Watermarking with Ultra-Low-Bitrate Neural Codecs