mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Which Features are Best for Successor Features?

arXiv 2502.10790 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2025cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 3

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Deep RL algorithms and representations

Abstract (arXiv)

In reinforcement learning, universal successor features (SFs) are a way to provide zero-shot adaptation to new tasks at test time: they provide optimal policies for all downstream reward functions lying in the linear span of a set of base features. But it is unclear what constitutes a good set of base features, that could be useful for a wide set of downstream tasks beyond their linear span. Laplacian eigenfunctions (the eigenfunctions of Delta+Delta^ast with Delta the Laplacian operator of some reference policy and Delta^ast that of the time-reversed dynamics) have been argued to play a role, and offer good empirical performance. Here, for the first time, we identify the optimal base features based on an objective criterion of downstream performance, in a non-tautological way without assuming the downstream tasks are linear in the features. We do this for three generic classes of downstream tasks: reaching a random goal state, dense random Gaussian rewards, and random ``scattered'' sparse rewards. The features yielding optimal expected downstream performance turn out to be the same for these three task families. They do not coincide with Laplacian eigenfunctions in general, though they can be expressed from Delta: in the simplest case (deterministic environment and decay factor γ close to 1), they are the eigenfunctions of Delta-1+(Delta-1)^ast. We obtain these results under an assumption of large behavior cloning regularization with respect to a reference policy, a setting often used for offline RL. Along the way, we get new insights into KL-regularizedoptionnatural policy gradient, and into the lack of SF information in the norm of Bellman gaps.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 19 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2025.

Builds on

19 of 22 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
  3. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,920
  4. 2018Diversity is All You Need: Learning Skills without a Reward Functioncited by 752
  5. 2016Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 340
  6. 2016Variational Intrinsic Controlcited by 267
  7. 2019Fast Task Inference with Variational Intrinsic Successor Featurescited by 133
  8. 2021Learning One Representation to Optimize All Rewardscited by 115
  9. 2021APS: Active Pretraining with Successor Featurescited by 112
  10. 2018Universal Successor Features Approximatorscited by 103
  11. 2018The Laplacian in RL: Learning Representations with Efficient Approximationscited by 86
  12. 2022Does Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning Exist?cited by 83
7 more
  1. 2021Learning Successor States and Goal-Dependent Values: A Mathematical Viewpointcited by 70
  2. 2016Deep Reinforcement Learning with Successor Features for Navigation across Similar Environmentscited by 50
  3. 2022Spectral Decomposition Representation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 36
  4. 2021A New Representation of Successor Features for Transfer across Dissimilar Environmentscited by 13
  5. 2019Disentangled Cumulants Help Successor Representations Transfer to New Taskscited by 11
  6. 2018Approximate Temporal Difference Learning is a Gradient Descent for Reversible Policiescited by 10
  7. 2021Unbiased Methods for Multi-Goal Reinforcement Learningcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Full-Gradient Successor Feature Representations
  2. 2024Learning Successor Features the Simple Way
  3. 2026Switching Successor Measures for Hierarchical Zero-shot Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2024Distributional Successor Features Enable Zero-Shot Policy Optimization
  5. 2026Robust Successor Features
  6. 2024Proto Successor Measure: Representing the Behavior Space of an RL Agent
  7. 2025Reward-Aware Proto-Representations in Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2024Decoupling Exploration and Exploitation for Unsupervised Pre-training with Successor Features