mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fast Hierarchical Games for Image Explanations

arXiv 2104.06164 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As modern complex neural networks keep breaking records and solving harder problems, their predictions also become less and less intelligible. The current lack of interpretability often undermines the deployment of accurate machine learning tools in sensitive settings. In this work, we present a model-agnostic explanation method for image classification based on a hierarchical extension of Shapley coefficients--Hierarchical Shap (h-Shap)--that resolves some of the limitations of current approaches. Unlike other Shapley-based explanation methods, h-Shap is scalable and can be computed without the need of approximation. Under certain distributional assumptions, such as those common in multiple instance learning, h-Shap retrieves the exact Shapley coefficients with an exponential improvement in computational complexity. We compare our hierarchical approach with popular Shapley-based and non-Shapley-based methods on a synthetic dataset, a medical imaging scenario, and a general computer vision problem, showing that h-Shap outperforms the state of the art in both accuracy and runtime. Code and experiments are made publicly available.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2021.

Builds on

24 of 50 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  4. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  6. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  7. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  8. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
  9. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
  10. 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
  11. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 208
  12. 2019Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problemcited by 167
12 more
  1. 2020True to the Model or True to the Data?cited by 126
  2. 2019Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilitycited by 114
  3. 2018L-Shapley and C-Shapley: Efficient Model Interpretation for Structured Datacited by 100
  4. 2020Multi-scale Domain-adversarial Multiple-instance CNN for Cancer Subtype Classification with Unannotated Histopathological Imagescited by 81
  5. 2018Hierarchical interpretations for neural network predictionscited by 66
  6. 2020Generating Hierarchical Explanations on Text Classification via Feature Interaction Detectioncited by 57
  7. 2021Do Input Gradients Highlight Discriminative Features?cited by 52
  8. 2018Interpretable to Whom? A Role-based Model for Analyzing Interpretable Machine Learning Systemscited by 48
  9. 2019Explaining Models by Propagating Shapley Values of Local Componentscited by 29
  10. 2021On Baselines for Local Feature Attributionscited by 29
  11. 2019A Rate-Distortion Framework for Explaining Neural Network Decisionscited by 24
  12. 2020In-Distribution Interpretability for Challenging Modalitiescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: