mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Integrated Decision Gradients: Compute Your Attributions Where the Model Makes Its Decision

arXiv 2305.20052 ↗First posted 31 May 2023cs.LG cs.CVcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Attribution algorithms are frequently employed to explain the decisions of neural network models. Integrated Gradients (IG) is an influential attribution method due to its strong axiomatic foundation. The algorithm is based on integrating the gradients along a path from a reference image to the input image. Unfortunately, it can be observed that gradients computed from regions where the output logit changes minimally along the path provide poor explanations for the model decision, which is called the saturation effect problem. In this paper, we propose an attribution algorithm called integrated decision gradients (IDG). The algorithm focuses on integrating gradients from the region of the path where the model makes its decision, i.e., the portion of the path where the output logit rapidly transitions from zero to its final value. This is practically realized by scaling each gradient by the derivative of the output logit with respect to the path. The algorithm thereby provides a principled solution to the saturation problem. Additionally, we minimize the errors within the Riemann sum approximation of the path integral by utilizing non-uniform subdivisions determined by adaptive sampling. In the evaluation on ImageNet, it is demonstrated that IDG outperforms IG, Left-IG, Guided IG, and adversarial gradient integration both qualitatively and quantitatively using standard insertion and deletion metrics across three common models.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2023.

Builds on

19 of 28 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  6. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  7. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  8. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  9. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  10. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  11. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  12. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
7 more
  1. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  2. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
  3. 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 516
  4. 2020Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Surveycited by 252
  5. 2019XRAI: Better Attributions Through Regionscited by 116
  6. 2021Guided Integrated Gradients: An Adaptive Path Method for Removing Noisecited by 102
  7. 2020Investigating Saturation Effects in Integrated Gradientscited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

9 papers.