mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Escaping Plato's Cave: JAM for Aligning Independently Trained Vision and Language Models

arXiv 2507.01201 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2025cs.LG cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Independently trained vision and language models inhabit disjoint representational spaces, shaped by their respective modalities, objectives, and architectures. The Platonic Representation Hypothesis (PRH) suggests these models may nonetheless converge toward a shared statistical model of reality. This raises a fundamental question: can we move beyond post-hoc detection of such alignment and explicitly optimize for it? We argue this challenge is most critical in fine-grained contextual distinctions-where multiple descriptions share global semantics but differ in subtle compositional details. We address this with the Joint Autoencoder Modulator (JAM), which aligns frozen unimodal models by jointly training modality-specific autoencoders with coordinated reconstruction and cross-modal alignment objectives. We systematically evaluate JAM across three design axes: (i) alignment objectives, introducing our multimodal Spread Loss that outperforms classic contrastive methods; (ii) the layer depth at which alignment is most effective; and (iii) the role of foundation model scale in representational convergence. Our findings show that JAM reliably induces alignment even across independently trained representations, offering both theoretical insight into the structure of shared semantics and practical guidance for transforming generalist unimodal foundations into specialist multimodal models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2025.

Builds on

34 of 51 references.

References · 34

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  5. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  6. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  7. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  8. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  9. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
  10. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  11. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
  12. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
22 more
  1. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  2. 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,804
  3. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  4. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  5. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
  6. 2023A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecastingcited by 692
  7. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 610
  8. 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 529
  9. 2024MOMENT: A Family of Open Time-series Foundation Modelscited by 482
  10. 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 382
  11. 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 324
  12. 2021WIT: Wikipedia-based Image Text Dataset for Multimodal Multilingual Machine Learningcited by 287
  13. 2020Understanding the Role of Individual Units in a Deep Neural Networkcited by 255
  14. 2014Understanding image representations by measuring their equivariance and equivalencecited by 243
  15. 2023SugarCrepe: Fixing Hackable Benchmarks for Vision-Language Compositionalitycited by 243
  16. 2024Foundation Models for Time Series Analysis: A Tutorial and Surveycited by 239
  17. 2021Revisiting Model Stitching to Compare Neural Representationscited by 209
  18. 2023Similarity of Neural Network Models: A Survey of Functional and Representational Measurescited by 131
  19. 2022Perfectly Balanced: Improving Transfer and Robustness of Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 40
  20. 2024TOTEM: TOkenized Time Series EMbeddings for General Time Series Analysiscited by 39
  21. 2021Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space, Mercer's Theorem, Eigenfunctions, Nystr"om Method, and Use of Kernels in Machine Learning: Tutorial and Surveycited by 37
  22. 2020Regularized linear autoencoders recover the principal components, eventuallycited by 26

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Cross-Modal Redundancy and the Geometry of Vision-Language Embeddings
  2. 2025Seeing Through Words, Speaking Through Pixels: Deep Representational Alignment Between Vision and Language Models
  3. 2025Large Vision-Language Model Alignment and Misalignment: A Survey Through the Lens of Explainability
  4. 2026SOTAlign: Semi-Supervised Alignment of Unimodal Vision and Language Models via Optimal Transport
  5. 2026Barycentric alignment for instance-level comparison of neural representations
  6. 2025Analyzing Fine-Grained Alignment and Enhancing Vision Understanding in Multimodal Language Models
  7. 2026When Language Overwrites Vision: Over-Alignment and Geometric Debiasing in Vision-Language Models
  8. 2026Mind the Heads: Topological Representation Alignment for Multimodal LLMs