Theory of Optimal Learning Rate Schedules and Scaling Laws for a Random Feature Model
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Setting the learning rate (LR) for a deep learning model is a critical part of successful training. Choosing LRs is often done empirically with trial and error. In this work, we explore a solvable model of optimal LR schedules for a powerlaw random feature model trained with stochastic gradient descent (SGD). We consider the optimal schedule ηT^star(t) where t is the current iterate and T is the training horizon. This schedule is computed both as a numerical optimization problem and also analytically using optimal control theory. Our analysis reveals two regimes which we term the easy phase and hard phase. In the easy phase the optimal schedule is a polynomial decay ηT^star(t) simeq T-xi (1-t/T)δ where xi and δ depend on the properties of the features and task. In the hard phase, the optimal schedule resembles warmup-stable-decay with constant initial LR and annealing performed over a vanishing fraction of training steps. We investigate joint optimization of LR and batch size and find batch ramps can improve the wall-clock time in the easy phase. Beyond SGD, we derive optimal schedules for momentum parameter β(t) and show that it improves the loss-scaling exponent in the hard phase. We compare our optimal schedule to various benchmarks including (1) optimal constant learning rates ηT(t) ~ T-xi (2) optimal power laws ηT(t) ~ T-xi t-chi, finding that our schedule achieves better rates than either of these. Our theory suggests that LR transfer across training horizon depends on the structure of the model and task. For ResNet image classification on CIFAR-5M, the learning curves exhibit hard-phase behavior where optimal base LRs are constant under sufficient annealing. GPT-2 style transformers trained in language modeling exhibit easy-phase behavior where optimal LRs shift even under annealing.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.
Builds on
33 of 49 references.
References · 33
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2024MiniCPM: Unveiling the Potential of Small Language Models with Scalable Training Strategiescited by 694
- 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
- 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 413
- 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 353
- 2017Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Sizecited by 313
- 2022Tensor Programs V: Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfercited by 272
- 2020Feature Learning in Infinite-Width Neural Networkscited by 182
- 2024SOAP: Improving and Stabilizing Shampoo using Adamcited by 179
- 2017Sobolev Norm Learning Rates for Regularized Least-Squares Algorithmcited by 113
21 more
- 2024A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Lawscited by 105
- 2024Understanding Warmup-Stable-Decay Learning Rates: A River Valley Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 75
- 2024Scaling Exponents Across Parameterizations and Optimizerscited by 71
- 2018Statistical Optimality of Stochastic Gradient Descent on Hard Learning Problems through Multiple Passescited by 69
- 2025Don't be lazy: CompleteP enables compute-efficient deep transformerscited by 69
- 20244+3 Phases of Compute-Optimal Neural Scaling Lawscited by 66
- 2023Depthwise Hyperparameter Transfer in Residual Networks: Dynamics and Scaling Limitcited by 64
- 2024How Feature Learning Can Improve Neural Scaling Lawscited by 55
- 2024Scaling Laws in Linear Regression: Compute, Parameters, and Datacited by 54
- 2021Last iterate convergence of SGD for Least-Squares in the Interpolation regimecited by 41
- 2023Optimal Linear Decay Learning Rate Schedules and Further Refinementscited by 41
- 2024Scaling Optimal LR Across Token Horizonscited by 35
- 2025Scaling Collapse Reveals Universal Dynamics in Compute-Optimally Trained Neural Networkscited by 21
- 2024Optimal Protocols for Continual Learning via Statistical Physics and Control Theorycited by 14
- 2022Selecting and Composing Learning Rate Policies for Deep Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2025Neural Thermodynamic Laws for Large Language Model Trainingcited by 10
- 2025Dimension-adapted Momentum Outscales SGDcited by 7
- 2025Seesaw: Accelerating Training by Balancing Learning Rate and Batch Size Schedulingcited by 5
- 2023Meta-Learning Strategies through Value Maximization in Neural Networkscited by 4
- 2025A statistical physics framework for optimal learningcited by 3
- 2026Optimal Learning Rate Schedule for Balancing Effort and Performancecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Power-Law Spectrum of the Random Feature Modelcited by 3
- 2026Statistical Properties of Training & Generalizationcited by 2
- 2026Compute Efficiency and Serial Runtime Tradeoffs for Stochastic Momentum Methodscited by 1
- 2026Asymmetric Scaling Laws from Sparse Featurescited by 0
- 2026Statistical Properties of Training & Generalization18 Jun 2026
- 2026Compute Efficiency and Serial Runtime Tradeoffs for Stochastic Momentum Methods17 Jun 2026
- 2026Asymmetric Scaling Laws from Sparse Features22 May 2026
- 2026Power-Law Spectrum of the Random Feature Model15 Mar 2026