Asymmetric Scaling Laws from Sparse Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce a model for neural scaling laws under sparse activations. In the model, test loss is often dominated by rare coordinates that are never observed in the training input. This mechanism induces a novel bottleneck absent from dense models. We derive the asymptotic population loss in both the underparameterized and overparameterized regimes, and show that the loss exhibits a double-descent peak near the interpolation threshold -- where the number of parameters is just sufficient to fit the training data -- resulting in a loss curve governed by two distinct scaling exponents -- one for the overparameterized regime and one for the underparameterized regime -- with a gap determined by the degree of sparsity. Additionally, we derive a compute-optimal frontier that favors increasing dataset size over model capacity under fixed compute budgets. We also analyze gradient-descent dynamics and identify a scaling law for the probability that fixed-step gradient descent becomes unstable. We further show that the sparsity-induced effect persists under nonlinear activations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2026.
Builds on
55 of 72 references.
References · 55
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 993
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
- 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
- 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
- 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
38 more
- 2023Scaling Data-Constrained Language Modelscited by 391
- 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 353
- 2020Spectrum Dependent Learning Curves in Kernel Regression and Wide Neural Networkscited by 200
- 2019Two models of double descent for weak featurescited by 194
- 2019On the Inductive Bias of Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 177
- 2024Scaling Laws for Fine-Grained Mixture of Expertscited by 166
- 2023Beyond Chinchilla-Optimal: Accounting for Inference in Language Model Scaling Lawscited by 155
- 2020Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold modelcited by 126
- 2017Optimal Errors and Phase Transitions in High-Dimensional Generalized Linear Modelscited by 115
- 2020The Gaussian equivalence of generative models for learning with shallow neural networkscited by 113
- 2021Generalization error of random features and kernel methods: hypercontractivity and kernel matrix concentrationcited by 110
- 2024A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Lawscited by 105
- 2022A Solvable Model of Neural Scaling Lawscited by 101
- 2024Scaling Laws for Precisioncited by 92
- 2021Learning with invariances in random features and kernel modelscited by 89
- 2024Resolving Discrepancies in Compute-Optimal Scaling of Language Modelscited by 84
- 2017A Random Matrix Approach to Neural Networkscited by 80
- 20244+3 Phases of Compute-Optimal Neural Scaling Lawscited by 66
- 2018The jamming transition as a paradigm to understand the loss landscape of deep neural networkscited by 61
- 2018The committee machine: Computational to statistical gaps in learning a two-layers neural networkcited by 58
- 2024How Feature Learning Can Improve Neural Scaling Lawscited by 55
- 2024Scaling Laws in Linear Regression: Compute, Parameters, and Datacited by 54
- 2025Parameters vs FLOPs: Scaling Laws for Optimal Sparsity for Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 48
- 2024Scaling and renormalization in high-dimensional regressioncited by 45
- 2025Power Lines: Scaling Laws for Weight Decay and Batch Size in LLM Pre-trainingcited by 41
- 2025Superposition Yields Robust Neural Scalingcited by 30
- 2025Emergence and scaling laws in SGD learning of shallow neural networkscited by 29
- 2022Learning sparse features can lead to overfitting in neural networkscited by 23
- 2024Dimension-free deterministic equivalents and scaling laws for random feature regressioncited by 23
- 2025Learning quadratic neural networks in high dimensions: SGD dynamics and scaling lawscited by 23
- 2025Scaling Laws and Spectra of Shallow Neural Networks in the Feature Learning Regimecited by 18
- 2026Deriving Neural Scaling Laws from the statistics of natural languagecited by 18
- 2025Functional Scaling Laws in Kernel Regression: Loss Dynamics and Learning Rate Schedulescited by 14
- 2025Larger Datasets Can Be Repeated More: A Theoretical Analysis of Multi-Epoch Scaling in Linear Regressioncited by 12
- 2026On the origin of neural scaling laws: from random graphs to natural languagecited by 12
- 2024Analyzing Neural Scaling Laws in Two-Layer Networks with Power-Law Data Spectracited by 9
- 2025Statistical mechanics of extensive-width Bayesian neural networks near interpolationcited by 9
- 2025Kernel ridge regression under power-law data: spectrum and generalizationcited by 8
50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.