mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Selecting and Composing Learning Rate Policies for Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2210.12936 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2022cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The choice of learning rate (LR) functions and policies has evolved from a simple fixed LR to the decaying LR and the cyclic LR, aiming to improve the accuracy and reduce the training time of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). This paper presents a systematic approach to selecting and composing an LR policy for effective DNN training to meet desired target accuracy and reduce training time within the pre-defined training iterations. It makes three original contributions. First, we develop an LR tuning mechanism for auto-verification of a given LR policy with respect to the desired accuracy goal under the pre-defined training time constraint. Second, we develop an LR policy recommendation system (LRBench) to select and compose good LR policies from the same and/or different LR functions through dynamic tuning, and avoid bad choices, for a given learning task, DNN model and dataset. Third, we extend LRBench by supporting different DNN optimizers and show the significant mutual impact of different LR policies and different optimizers. Evaluated using popular benchmark datasets and different DNN models (LeNet, CNN3, ResNet), we show that our approach can effectively deliver high DNN test accuracy, outperform the existing recommended default LR policies, and reduce the DNN training time by 1.6~6.7× to meet a targeted model accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2022.

Builds on

23 of 46 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  5. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  6. 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,489
  7. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
  8. 2018Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Trainingcited by 395
  9. 2019AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Artcited by 388
  10. 2018AMC: AutoML for Model Compression and Acceleration on Mobile Devicescited by 375
  11. 2014Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embeddingcited by 287
  12. 2014Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional non-convex optimizationcited by 286
11 more
  1. 2017Forward and Reverse Gradient-Based Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 232
  2. 2017Super-Convergence: Very Fast Training of Neural Networks Using Large Learning Ratescited by 196
  3. 2020AutoML-Zero: Evolving Machine Learning Algorithms From Scratchcited by 137
  4. 2017Online Learning Rate Adaptation with Hypergradient Descentcited by 117
  5. 2017Neural Optimizer Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 82
  6. 2019Towards Automated Machine Learning: Evaluation and Comparison of AutoML Approaches and Toolscited by 25
  7. 2021AutoLRS: Automatic Learning-Rate Schedule by Bayesian Optimization on the Flycited by 14
  8. 2018A Comparative Measurement Study of Deep Learning as a Service Frameworkcited by 10
  9. 2020AutoLR: An Evolutionary Approach to Learning Rate Policiescited by 4
  10. 2015The Effects of Hyperparameters on SGD Training of Neural Networkscited by 3
  11. 2014ADASECANT: Robust Adaptive Secant Method for Stochastic Gradientcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

11 papers.