Dimension-adapted Momentum Outscales SGD
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate scaling laws for stochastic momentum algorithms with small batch on the power law random features model, parameterized by data complexity, target complexity, and model size. When trained with a stochastic momentum algorithm, our analysis reveals four distinct loss curve shapes determined by varying data-target complexities. While traditional stochastic gradient descent with momentum (SGD-M) yields identical scaling law exponents to SGD, dimension-adapted Nesterov acceleration (DANA) improves these exponents by scaling momentum hyperparameters based on model size and data complexity. This outscaling phenomenon, which also improves compute-optimal scaling behavior, is achieved by DANA across a broad range of data and target complexities, while traditional methods fall short. Extensive experiments on high-dimensional synthetic quadratics validate our theoretical predictions and large-scale text experiments with LSTMs show DANA's improved loss exponents over SGD hold in a practical setting.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 May 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 11.
12 papers.
- 2026Sharp Capacity Scaling of Spectral Optimizers in Learning Associative Memorycited by 14
- 2026A Defense of the Quadratic Modelcited by 14
- 2026Theory of Optimal Learning Rate Schedules and Scaling Laws for a Random Feature Modelcited by 7
- 2026Power-Law Spectrum of the Random Feature Modelcited by 4
- 2025On the Effectiveness of the z-Transform Method in Quadratic Optimizationcited by 3
- 2026Phases of Muon: When Muon Eclipses SignSGDcited by 3
- 2026Compute Efficiency and Serial Runtime Tradeoffs for Stochastic Momentum Methodscited by 2
- 2026High dimensional theory of two-phase optimizerscited by 1
- 2026Optimizer Memory Schedules for Outscaling the Overtraining Axiscited by 1
- 2026What do near-optimal learning rate schedules look like?cited by 0
- 2026Dynamics of Stochastic Momentum with Sparse Updates in High Dimensionscited by 0
- 2026Simulating Training Spikes of Deep Neural Networks by Layer-wise Random Feature Modelscited by 0
- 2026Simulating Training Spikes of Deep Neural Networks by Layer-wise Random Feature Models9 Oct 2026
- 2026Optimizer Memory Schedules for Outscaling the Overtraining Axis4 Sep 2026
- 2026A Defense of the Quadratic Model23 Jul 2026
- 2026Compute Efficiency and Serial Runtime Tradeoffs for Stochastic Momentum Methods17 Jun 2026
- 2026Dynamics of Stochastic Momentum with Sparse Updates in High Dimensions27 May 2026
- 2026Phases of Muon: When Muon Eclipses SignSGD10 May 2026
- 2026High dimensional theory of two-phase optimizers27 Mar 2026
- 2026Sharp Capacity Scaling of Spectral Optimizers in Learning Associative Memory27 Mar 2026
- 2026Power-Law Spectrum of the Random Feature Model15 Mar 2026
- 2026What do near-optimal learning rate schedules look like?11 Mar 2026
- 2026Theory of Optimal Learning Rate Schedules and Scaling Laws for a Random Feature Model4 Feb 2026
- 2025On the Effectiveness of the z-Transform Method in Quadratic Optimization4 Jul 2025