mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient Adversarial Attacks on High-dimensional Offline Bandits

arXiv 2602.01658 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward hacking and misspecification

Abstract (arXiv)

Bandit algorithms have recently emerged as a powerful tool for evaluating machine learning models, including generative image models and large language models, by efficiently identifying top-performing candidates without exhaustive comparisons. These methods typically rely on a reward model, often distributed with public weights on platforms such as Hugging Face, to provide feedback to the bandit. While online evaluation is expensive and requires repeated trials, offline evaluation with logged data has become an attractive alternative. However, the adversarial robustness of offline bandit evaluation remains largely unexplored, particularly when an attacker perturbs the reward model (rather than the training data) prior to bandit training. In this work, we fill this gap by investigating, both theoretically and empirically, the vulnerability of offline bandit training to adversarial manipulations of the reward model. We introduce a novel threat model in which an attacker exploits offline data in high-dimensional settings to hijack the bandit's behavior. Starting with linear reward functions and extending to nonlinear models such as ReLU neural networks, we study attacks on two Hugging Face evaluators used for generative model assessment: one measuring aesthetic quality and the other assessing compositional alignment. Our results show that even small, imperceptible perturbations to the reward model's weights can drastically alter the bandit's behavior. From a theoretical perspective, we prove a striking high-dimensional effect: as input dimensionality increases, the perturbation norm required for a successful attack decreases, making modern applications such as image evaluation especially vulnerable. Extensive experiments confirm that naive random perturbations are ineffective, whereas carefully targeted perturbations achieve near-perfect attack success rates ...

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward hacking and misspecification, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 34 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.

Builds on

34 of 53 references.

References · 34

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  3. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  4. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  5. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  7. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  8. 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,290
  9. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  10. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  11. 2023ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,010
  12. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
22 more
  1. 2023TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answeringcited by 416
  2. 2023Davidsonian Scene Graph: Improving Reliability in Fine-grained Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 159
  3. 2024GenAI-Bench: Evaluating and Improving Compositional Text-to-Visual Generationcited by 130
  4. 2018Stochastic bandits robust to adversarial corruptionscited by 118
  5. 2019Better Algorithms for Stochastic Bandits with Adversarial Corruptionscited by 91
  6. 2015Cascading Bandits: Learning to Rank in the Cascade Modelcited by 75
  7. 2014Algorithms for multi-armed bandit problemscited by 63
  8. 2018Adversarial Attacks on Stochastic Banditscited by 56
  9. 2019Data Poisoning Attacks on Stochastic Banditscited by 52
  10. 2016On Explore-Then-Commit Strategiescited by 46
  11. 2020Adversarial Attacks on Linear Contextual Banditscited by 34
  12. 2023Divide, Evaluate, and Refine: Evaluating and Improving Text-to-Image Alignment with Iterative VQA Feedbackcited by 31
  13. 2022Guarantees for Epsilon-Greedy Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximationcited by 29
  14. 2024Kandinsky 3: Text-to-Image Synthesis for Multifunctional Generative Frameworkcited by 25
  15. 2018Data Poisoning Attacks in Contextual Banditscited by 22
  16. 2022Neural Tangent Kernel: A Surveycited by 22
  17. 2024A Multi-Armed Bandit Approach to Online Selection and Evaluation of Generative Modelscited by 13
  18. 2024Be More Diverse than the Most Diverse: Optimal Mixtures of Generative Models via Mixture-UCB Bandit Algorithmscited by 13
  19. 2024Improved Algorithms for Contextual Dynamic Pricingcited by 11
  20. 2024PAK-UCB Contextual Bandit: An Online Learning Approach to Prompt-Aware Selection of Generative Models and LLMscited by 11
  21. 2024Hyperparameter Optimization Can Even be Harmful in Off-Policy Learning and How to Deal with Itcited by 5
  22. 2025T2I-FineEval: Fine-Grained Compositional Metric for Text-to-Image Evaluationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Towards Robust Policy: Enhancing Offline Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Attacks and Defenses
  2. 2024Nearly Optimal Algorithms for Contextual Dueling Bandits from Adversarial Feedback
  3. 2026Direction-Aware Offline-to-Online Learning in Linear Contextual Bandits
  4. 2023Assessing Robustness via Score-Based Adversarial Image Generation
  5. 2023Model-based Offline Policy Optimization with Adversarial Network
  6. 2021Offline Neural Contextual Bandits: Pessimism, Optimization and Generalization
  7. 2026Reward Stealing Attack on Large Language Models
  8. 2023Adversarial Model for Offline Reinforcement Learning