CARE-RFT: Confidence-Anchored Reinforcement Finetuning for Reliable Reasoning in Large Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement finetuning (RFT) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for unlocking reasoning capabilities in large language models. However, we identify a critical trade-off: while unconstrained RFT achieves strong reasoning performance, it severely compromises model trustworthiness by amplifying hallucination and worsening calibration; conversely, RKL-constrained RFT preserves trustworthiness but limits reasoning gains due to its unbounded penalty on exploratory deviations. To resolve this tension, we introduce CARE-RFT (Confidence-Anchored Regularized Reinforcement Finetuning), a novel method that replaces standard reverse KL regularization with a skew reverse KL divergence. CARE-RFT provides a confidence-sensitive penalty: it is bounded for confident, consistently rewarded explorations to enable reasoning, while unbounded elsewhere to preserve calibration. Extensive experiments across multiple model scales and RFT algorithms show that CARE-RFT achieves a superior balance, matching the reasoning performance of unconstrained RFT while recovering the trustworthiness and calibration of the base model. Our work establishes that careful, confidence-aware regularization is key to building both capable and trustworthy reasoning models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 40 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2026.
Builds on
40 of 49 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2025SSPO: Self-traced Step-wise Preference Optimization for Process Supervision and Reasoning Compression18 Aug
- 2025Geometric-Mean Policy Optimization28 Jul
- 2025MOTIF: Modular Thinking via Reinforcement Fine-tuning in LLMs3 Jul
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective26 Mar
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale18 Mar
- 2024Learning Planning-based Reasoning by Trajectories Collection and Process Reward Synthesizing1 Feb
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations14 Dec
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul
Other references · 31
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 788
19 more
- 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 668
- 2023Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 317
- 2024TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Modelscited by 280
- 2023Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 238
- 2023Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPOcited by 226
- 2025Why Language Models Hallucinatecited by 205
- 2016R'enyi Divergence Variational Inferencecited by 104
- 2025Does Math Reasoning Improve General LLM Capabilities? Understanding Transferability of LLM Reasoningcited by 101
- 2025Medical Hallucinations in Foundation Models and Their Impact on Healthcarecited by 89
- 2025Unified Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reward Model through Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 86
- 2025Are Reasoning Models More Prone to Hallucination?cited by 62
- 2024Benchmarking Hallucination in Large Language Models based on Unanswerable Math Word Problemcited by 42
- 2023Ever: Mitigating Hallucination in Large Language Models through Real-Time Verification and Rectificationcited by 38
- 2025The Hallucination Tax of Reinforcement Finetuningcited by 35
- 2025Detection and Mitigation of Hallucination in Large Reasoning Models: A Mechanistic Perspectivecited by 32
- 2025Step-KTO: Optimizing Mathematical Reasoning through Stepwise Binary Feedbackcited by 22
- 2017f-Divergence constrained policy improvementcited by 15
- 2025HalluciNot: Hallucination Detection Through Context and Common Knowledge Verificationcited by 13
- 2025SCOUT: Teaching Pre-trained Language Models to Enhance Reasoning via Flow Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Reinforcement Inference: Leveraging Uncertainty for Self-Correcting Language Model Reasoning
- 2025Trust-Region Adaptive Policy Optimization
- 2025Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Powers Reasoning Capability of Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning via Selective Critical Token Fine-Tuning
- 2025SRFT: A Single-Stage Method with Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Reasoning
- 2026On the Pitfalls of Verbalized Confidence Priors for Calibrating Large Reasoning Models
- 2025Beyond Correctness: Confidence-Aware Reward Modeling for Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning
- 2025A Sober Look at Progress in Language Model Reasoning: Pitfalls and Paths to Reproducibility