mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Calibration of Human Driving Behavior and Preference Using Naturalistic Traffic Data

arXiv 2105.01820 ↗First posted 5 May 2021cs.MA cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding human driving behaviors quantitatively is critical even in the era when connected and autonomous vehicles and smart infrastructure are becoming ever more prevalent. This is particularly so as that mixed traffic settings, where autonomous vehicles and human driven vehicles co-exist, are expected to persist for quite some time. Towards this end it is necessary that we have a comprehensive modeling framework for decision-making within which human driving preferences can be inferred statistically from observed driving behaviors in realistic and naturalistic traffic settings. Leveraging a recently proposed computational framework for smart vehicles in a smart world using multi-agent based simulation and optimization, we first recapitulate how the forward problem of driving decision-making is modeled as a state space model. We then show how the model can be inverted to estimate driver preferences from naturalistic traffic data using the standard Kalman filter technique. We explicitly illustrate our approach using the vehicle trajectory data from Sugiyama experiment that was originally meant to demonstrate how stop-and-go shockwave can arise spontaneously without bottlenecks. Not only the estimated state filter can fit the observed data well for each individual vehicle, the inferred utility functions can also re-produce quantitatively similar pattern of the observed collective behaviors. One distinct advantage of our approach is the drastically reduced computational burden. This is possible because our forward model treats driving decision process, which is intrinsically dynamic with multi-agent interactions, as a sequence of independent static optimization problems contingent on the state with a finite look ahead anticipation. Consequently we can practically sidestep solving an interacting dynamic inversion problem that would have been much more computationally demanding.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2021.

Builds on

11 of 44 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016Guided Cost Learning: Deep Inverse Optimal Control via Policy Optimizationcited by 400
  2. 2018The highD Dataset: A Drone Dataset of Naturalistic Vehicle Trajectories on German Highways for Validation of Highly Automated Driving Systemscited by 276
  3. 2019INTERACTION Dataset: An INTERnational, Adversarial and Cooperative moTION Dataset in Interactive Driving Scenarios with Semantic Mapscited by 231
  4. 2017Dissipation of stop-and-go waves via control of autonomous vehicles: Field experimentscited by 41
  5. 2020Efficient Sampling-Based Maximum Entropy Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Application to Autonomous Drivingcited by 34
  6. 2019Driving with Style: Inverse Reinforcement Learning in General-Purpose Planning for Automated Drivingcited by 30
  7. 2018Probabilistic Prediction of Interactive Driving Behavior via Hierarchical Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 28
  8. 2018Courteous Autonomous Carscited by 14
  9. 2020Planning on the fast lane: Learning to interact using attention mechanisms in path integral inverse reinforcement learningcited by 4
  10. 2017Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Conditional Choice Probabilitiescited by 3
  11. 2020Towards a Systematic Computational Framework for Modeling Multi-Agent Decision-Making at Micro Level for Smart Vehicles in a Smart Worldcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Aligning Microscopic Vehicle and Macroscopic Traffic Statistics: Reconstructing Driving Behavior from Partial Data
  2. 2025Toward Safety-First Human-Like Decision Making for Autonomous Vehicles in Time-Varying Traffic Flow
  3. 2020Driving Behavior Modeling using Naturalistic Human Driving Data with Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2022Game-Theoretic Planning for Autonomous Driving among Risk-Aware Human Drivers
  5. 2025Quantifying and Modeling Driving Styles in Trajectory Forecasting
  6. 2024Act Natural! Projecting Autonomous System Trajectories Into Naturalistic Behavior Sets ↗
  7. 2025Understanding Driver Cognition and Decision-Making Behaviors in High-Risk Scenarios: A Drift Diffusion Perspective
  8. 2023Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback for Realistic Traffic Simulation