mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Agentic AI for Software: thoughts from Software Engineering community

arXiv 2508.17343 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2025cs.SE cs.AIcited by 10

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

AI agents have recently shown significant promise in software engineering. Much public attention has been transfixed on the topic of code generation from Large Language Models (LLMs) via a prompt. However, software engineering is much more than programming, and AI agents go far beyond instructions given by a prompt. At the code level, common software tasks include code generation, testing, and program repair. Design level software tasks may include architecture exploration, requirements understanding, and requirements enforcement at the code level. Each of these software tasks involves micro-decisions which can be taken autonomously by an AI agent, aided by program analysis tools. This creates the vision of an AI software engineer, where the AI agent can be seen as a member of a development team. Conceptually, the key to successfully developing trustworthy agentic AI-based software workflows will be to resolve the core difficulty in software engineering - the deciphering and clarification of developer intent. Specification inference, or deciphering the intent, thus lies at the heart of many software tasks, including software maintenance and program repair. A successful deployment of agentic technology into software engineering would involve making conceptual progress in such intent inference via agents. Trusting the AI agent becomes a key aspect, as software engineering becomes more automated. Higher automation also leads to higher volume of code being automatically generated, and then integrated into code-bases. Thus to deal with this explosion, an emerging direction is AI-based verification and validation (V & V) of AI generated code. We posit that agentic software workflows in future will include such AIbased V&V.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 5 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2025.

Builds on

5 of 11 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024SpecRover: Code Intent Extraction via LLMs5 Aug
  2. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents23 Jul
  3. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering6 May

Other references · 2

  1. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  2. 2021Asleep at the Keyboard? Assessing the Security of GitHub Copilot's Code Contributionscited by 431

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 7.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Agentic AI Software Engineers: Programming with Trust
  2. 2026Rethinking Software Engineering for Agentic AI Systems
  3. 2026Reproducible, Explainable, and Effective Evaluations of Agentic AI for Software Engineering
  4. 2026Agentic AI in the Software Development Lifecycle: Architecture, Empirical Evidence, and the Reshaping of Software Engineering
  5. 2025AI Agentic Programming: A Survey of Techniques, Challenges, and Opportunities
  6. 2026An Exploratory Study of Agent Plans for Agentic AI Coding Tools in Open-Source Software
  7. 2026Supporting software engineering tasks with agentic AI: Demonstration on document retrieval and test scenario generation
  8. 2026How Do AI Coding Agents Contribute to Software Development? an Empirical Study of Agentic Pull Requests