mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Assessing the Quality of the Steps to Reproduce in Bug Reports

arXiv 1906.07107 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2019cs.SEcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A major problem with user-written bug reports, indicated by developers and documented by researchers, is the (lack of high) quality of the reported steps to reproduce the bugs. Low-quality steps to reproduce lead to excessive manual effort spent on bug triage and resolution. This paper proposes Euler, an approach that automatically identifies and assesses the quality of the steps to reproduce in a bug report, providing feedback to the reporters, which they can use to improve the bug report. The feedback provided by Euler was assessed by external evaluators and the results indicate that Euler correctly identified 98% of the existing steps to reproduce and 58% of the missing ones, while 73% of its quality annotations are correct.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 7.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: