Calibration without Ground Truth
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Villalobos et al. [2024] predict that publicly available human text will be exhausted within the next decade. Thus, improving models without access to ground-truth labels becomes increasingly important. We propose a label-free post-processing framework that improves a strong but miscalibrated model using a weaker yet better-calibrated reference. Our framework guarantees a strict performance improvement under any proper loss. Our approach is based on a characterization of when strict improvement is possible: when the strong and reference models are not mutually calibrated. We formalize this condition, connect it to arbitrage and no-trade results from economics, and develop an efficient Bregman projection algorithm that guarantees worst-case loss reduction without labels. Experiments on representative LLMs across varying scales demonstrate that our label-free method significantly reduces proper losses and calibration errors, achieving performance competitive with supervised baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2026.
Builds on
26 of 51 references.
References · 26
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
14 more
- 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 788
- 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 731
- 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 445
- 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 359
- 2024Are We Done with MMLU?cited by 178
- 2025Beyond Binary Rewards: Training LMs to Reason About Their Uncertaintycited by 107
- 2024Taming Overconfidence in LLMs: Reward Calibration in RLHFcited by 105
- 2024"My Answer is C": First-Token Probabilities Do Not Match Text Answers in Instruction-Tuned Language Modelscited by 66
- 2020Calibrated Prediction with Covariate Shift via Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 43
- 2024Evaluating language models as risk scorescited by 24
- 2016A scaled Bregman theorem with applicationscited by 7
- 2025Coherence Mechanisms for Provable Self-Improvementcited by 3
- 2023Estimating calibration error under label shift without labelscited by 2
- 2020Feasible Joint Posterior Beliefscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.