mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Calibration without Ground Truth

arXiv 2601.19862 ↗First posted 27 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.GTcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Villalobos et al. [2024] predict that publicly available human text will be exhausted within the next decade. Thus, improving models without access to ground-truth labels becomes increasingly important. We propose a label-free post-processing framework that improves a strong but miscalibrated model using a weaker yet better-calibrated reference. Our framework guarantees a strict performance improvement under any proper loss. Our approach is based on a characterization of when strict improvement is possible: when the strong and reference models are not mutually calibrated. We formalize this condition, connect it to arbitrage and no-trade results from economics, and develop an efficient Bregman projection algorithm that guarantees worst-case loss reduction without labels. Experiments on representative LLMs across varying scales demonstrate that our label-free method significantly reduces proper losses and calibration errors, achieving performance competitive with supervised baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2026.

Builds on

26 of 51 references.

References · 26

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  4. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  5. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  7. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  8. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  9. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  10. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  11. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  12. 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
14 more
  1. 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 788
  2. 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 731
  3. 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 445
  4. 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 359
  5. 2024Are We Done with MMLU?cited by 178
  6. 2025Beyond Binary Rewards: Training LMs to Reason About Their Uncertaintycited by 107
  7. 2024Taming Overconfidence in LLMs: Reward Calibration in RLHFcited by 105
  8. 2024"My Answer is C": First-Token Probabilities Do Not Match Text Answers in Instruction-Tuned Language Modelscited by 66
  9. 2020Calibrated Prediction with Covariate Shift via Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 43
  10. 2024Evaluating language models as risk scorescited by 24
  11. 2016A scaled Bregman theorem with applicationscited by 7
  12. 2025Coherence Mechanisms for Provable Self-Improvementcited by 3
  13. 2023Estimating calibration error under label shift without labelscited by 2
  14. 2020Feasible Joint Posterior Beliefscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.