Coherence Mechanisms for Provable Self-Improvement
On the map: Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs → Self-rewarding alignment and self-training
Abstract (arXiv)
Self-improvement is a critical capability for large language models and other intelligent systems, enabling them to refine their behavior and internal consistency without external supervision. Despite its importance, prior approaches largely rely on empirical heuristics and lack formal guarantees. In this paper, we propose a principled framework for self-improvement based on the concept of coherence, which requires that a model's outputs remain consistent under task-preserving transformations of the input. We formalize this concept using projection-based mechanisms that update a baseline model to be coherent while remaining as close as possible to its original behavior. We provide rigorous theoretical guarantees that these mechanisms achieve monotonic improvement, measured by a reduction in expected Bregman divergence. Our analysis is comprehensive, covering both direct and two-step projection methods, and robustly extends these guarantees to non-realizable settings, empirical (finite-sample) distributions, and relaxed coherence constraints. Furthermore, we establish a general characterization theorem, showing that any mechanism with similar provable improvement guarantees must inherently conform to a coherence-based structure. This culminates in rigidity results under the demand for universal improvement, establishing coherence as a fundamental and, in a formal sense, necessary principle for provable self-improvement.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Self-rewarding alignment and self-training, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs. Builds on 12 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2025.
Builds on
12 of 78 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 11
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,628
- 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,125
- 2025Deep Think with Confidencecited by 205
- 2023Combining Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Internet: Heading towards Evolution or Degradation?cited by 41
- 2025Pre-training under infinite computecited by 29
- 2021Deep Bregman Divergence for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 13
- 2016A scaled Bregman theorem with applicationscited by 7
- 2023Playing Large Games with Oracles and AI Debatecited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Distributional Alignment Games for Answer-Level Fine-Tuning29 Apr 2026
- 2026A Task-Centric Theory for Iterative Self-Improvement with Easy-to-Hard Curricula10 Feb 2026
- 2026Calibration without Ground Truth27 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Self-Improvement as Coherence Optimization: A Theoretical Account
- 2026Self-Reference in Large Language Models: The Introspection Threshold for Recursive Self-Improvement
- 2024Mind the Gap: Examining the Self-Improvement Capabilities of Large Language Models
- 2025Theoretical Modeling of Large Language Model Self-Improvement Training Dynamics Through Solver-Verifier Gap
- 2025Self-Improving AI Agents through Self-Play
- 2026When Does Intrinsic Self-Correction Help? A Task-Sensitive Analysis
- 2025The Recursive Coherence Principle: A Formal Constraint on Scalable Intelligence, Alignment, and Reasoning Architecture
- 2026COEVO: Co-Evolving Context and Parameters for Recursive Self-Improvement