mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Estimating calibration error under label shift without labels

arXiv 2312.08586 ↗First posted 14 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.CV stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the face of dataset shift, model calibration plays a pivotal role in ensuring the reliability of machine learning systems. Calibration error (CE) is an indicator of the alignment between the predicted probabilities and the classifier accuracy. While prior works have delved into the implications of dataset shift on calibration, existing CE estimators assume access to labels from the target domain, which are often unavailable in practice, i.e., when the model is deployed and used. This work addresses such challenging scenario, and proposes a novel CE estimator under label shift, which is characterized by changes in the marginal label distribution p(Y), while keeping the conditional p(X|Y) constant between the source and target distributions. Our contribution is an approach, which, by leveraging importance re-weighting of the labeled source distribution, provides consistent and asymptotically unbiased CE estimation with respect to the shifted target distribution. Empirical results across diverse real-world datasets, under various conditions and label-shift intensities, demonstrate the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed estimator.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Dec 2023.

Builds on

26 of 46 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  6. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  7. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  8. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  9. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
  10. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  11. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  12. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 987
14 more
  1. 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 443
  2. 2018Detecting and Correcting for Label Shift with Black Box Predictorscited by 364
  3. 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 359
  4. 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 307
  5. 2020Mix-n-Match: Ensemble and Compositional Methods for Uncertainty Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 190
  6. 2019Evaluating model calibration in classificationcited by 165
  7. 2019A review of domain adaptation without target labelscited by 154
  8. 2019Regularized Learning for Domain Adaptation under Label Shiftscited by 118
  9. 2021Soft Calibration Objectives for Neural Networkscited by 89
  10. 2021The iWildCam 2021 Competition Datasetcited by 77
  11. 2015Posterior calibration and exploratory analysis for natural language processing modelscited by 75
  12. 2022A Consistent and Differentiable Lp Canonical Calibration Error Estimatorcited by 44
  13. 2023Transfer Knowledge from Head to Tail: Uncertainty Calibration under Long-tailed Distributioncited by 12
  14. 2023ELSA: Efficient Label Shift Adaptation through the Lens of Semiparametric Modelscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.