The Geometry of Robustness: Optimizing Loss Landscape Curvature and Feature Manifold Alignment for Robust Finetuning of Vision-Language Models
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness
Abstract (arXiv)
Fine-tuning approaches for Vision-Language Models (VLMs) face a critical three-way trade-off between In-Distribution (ID) accuracy, Out-of-Distribution (OOD) generalization, and adversarial robustness. Existing robust fine-tuning strategies resolve at most two axes of this trade-off. Generalization-preserving methods retain ID/OOD performance but leave models vulnerable to adversarial attacks, while adversarial training improves robustness to targeted attacks but degrades ID/OOD accuracy. Our key insight is that the robustness trade-off stems from two geometric failures: sharp, anisotropic minima in parameter space and unstable feature representations that deform under perturbation. To address this, we propose GRACE (Gram-aligned Robustness via Adaptive Curvature Estimation), a unified fine-tuning framework that jointly regularizes the parameter-space curvature and feature-space invariance for VLMs. Grounded in Robust PAC-Bayes theory, GRACE employs adaptive weight perturbations scaled by local curvature to promote flatter minima, combined with a feature alignment loss that maintains representation consistency across clean, adversarial, and OOD inputs. On ImageNet fine-tuning of CLIP models, GRACE simultaneously improves ID accuracy by 10.8%, and adversarial accuracy by 13.5% while maintaining 57.0% OOD accuracy (vs. 57.4% zero-shot baseline). Geometric analysis confirms that GRACE converges to flatter minima without feature distortion across distribution shifts, providing a principled step toward generalized robustness in foundation VLMs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 34 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Mar 2026.
Builds on
34 of 39 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Robust CLIP: Unsupervised Adversarial Fine-Tuning of Vision Embeddings for Robust Large Vision-Language Models19 Feb
- 2024Pre-trained Model Guided Fine-Tuning for Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness9 Jan
- 2023On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Models26 May
- 2022Understanding Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness for Large-Scale Models14 Dec
Other references · 30
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
- 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,130
18 more
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
- 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
- 2017Exploring Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 600
- 2017A PAC-Bayesian Approach to Spectrally-Normalized Margin Bounds for Neural Networkscited by 314
- 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 282
- 2023Sophia: A Scalable Stochastic Second-order Optimizer for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 265
- 2021Combined Scaling for Zero-shot Transfer Learningcited by 182
- 2022Finetune like you pretrain: Improved finetuning of zero-shot vision modelscited by 150
- 2018Improving the Generalization of Adversarial Training with Domain Adaptationcited by 48
- 2013A PAC-Bayesian Tutorial with A Dropout Boundcited by 43
- 2023Trainable Projected Gradient Method for Robust Fine-tuningcited by 37
- 2023Language-Driven Anchors for Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustnesscited by 23
- 2023Fast Trainable Projection for Robust Fine-Tuningcited by 19
- 2022Improving Out-of-Distribution Generalization by Adversarial Training with Structured Priorscited by 17
- 2024Lipsum-FT: Robust Fine-Tuning of Zero-Shot Models Using Random Text Guidancecited by 14
- 2025Directional Gradient Projection for Robust Fine-Tuning of Foundation Modelscited by 11
- 2021Rethinking Natural Adversarial Examples for Classification Modelscited by 9
- 2024Rethinking Weight Decay for Robust Fine-Tuning of Foundation Modelscited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026What Makes VLMs Robust? Towards Reconciling Robustness and Accuracy in Vision-Language Models
- 2026Unifying Adversarially Robust Model Experts in Vision-Language Models
- 2026VLM-RobustBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Robustness of Vision-Language Models
- 2025Unveiling the Lack of LVLM Robustness to Fundamental Visual Variations: Why and Path Forward
- 2025Navigating the Trade-off: A Synthesis of Defensive Strategies for Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness in Vision-Language Models
- 2026Hierarchically Robust Zero-shot Vision-language Models
- 2026Validating, Not Sampling: Region-Level Robustness of Vision-Language and Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2024Towards Adversarially Robust Vision-Language Models: Insights from Design Choices and Prompt Formatting Techniques