mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adversarial Feature Alignment: Balancing Robustness and Accuracy in Deep Learning via Adversarial Training

arXiv 2402.12187 ↗First posted 19 Feb 2024cs.CV cs.CR cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models continue to advance in accuracy, yet they remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, which often lead to the misclassification of adversarial examples. Adversarial training is used to mitigate this problem by increasing robustness against these attacks. However, this approach typically reduces a model's standard accuracy on clean, non-adversarial samples. The necessity for deep learning models to balance both robustness and accuracy for security is obvious, but achieving this balance remains challenging, and the underlying reasons are yet to be clarified. This paper proposes a novel adversarial training method called Adversarial Feature Alignment (AFA), to address these problems. Our research unveils an intriguing insight: misalignment within the feature space often leads to misclassification, regardless of whether the samples are benign or adversarial. AFA mitigates this risk by employing a novel optimization algorithm based on contrastive learning to alleviate potential feature misalignment. Through our evaluations, we demonstrate the superior performance of AFA. The baseline AFA delivers higher robust accuracy than previous adversarial contrastive learning methods while minimizing the drop in clean accuracy to 1.86% and 8.91% on CIFAR10 and CIFAR100, respectively, in comparison to cross-entropy. We also show that joint optimization of AFA and TRADES, accompanied by data augmentation using a recent diffusion model, achieves state-of-the-art accuracy and robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 62 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2024.

Builds on

62 of 94 references.

References · 62

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  5. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  6. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  7. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
  8. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  9. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  10. 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,297
  11. 2018Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximizationcited by 1,265
  12. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
38 more
  1. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 987
  2. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  3. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  4. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  5. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  6. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
  7. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
  8. 2018Lipschitz regularity of deep neural networks: analysis and efficient estimationcited by 413
  9. 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
  10. 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
  11. 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 328
  12. 2019Efficient and Accurate Estimation of Lipschitz Constants for Deep Neural Networkscited by 290
  13. 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 280
  14. 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 276
  15. 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 268
  16. 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 233
  17. 2021Parametric Contrastive Learningcited by 217
  18. 2023Better Diffusion Models Further Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 207
  19. 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
  20. 2017On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examplescited by 180
  21. 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 148
  22. 2020Robust Pre-Training by Adversarial Contrastive Learningcited by 144
  23. 2019Adversarial Training Can Hurt Generalizationcited by 131
  24. 2021Globally-Robust Neural Networkscited by 106
  25. 2020Robust Federated Learning: The Case of Affine Distribution Shiftscited by 102
  26. 2020Contrastive Learning with Adversarial Examplescited by 91
  27. 2019ClusterFit: Improving Generalization of Visual Representationscited by 82
  28. 2021Weakly Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 81
  29. 2020Do Wider Neural Networks Really Help Adversarial Robustness?cited by 79
  30. 2016Adversarial Examples Detection in Deep Networks with Convolutional Filter Statisticscited by 77
  31. 2017SafetyNet: Detecting and Rejecting Adversarial Examples Robustlycited by 76
  32. 2021When Does Contrastive Learning Preserve Adversarial Robustness from Pretraining to Finetuning?cited by 76
  33. 2021Training Certifiably Robust Neural Networks with Efficient Local Lipschitz Boundscited by 64
  34. 2021Unleashing the Power of Contrastive Self-Supervised Visual Models via Contrast-Regularized Fine-Tuningcited by 50
  35. 2022Efficient and Effective Augmentation Strategy for Adversarial Trainingcited by 43
  36. 2023Data Augmentation Alone Can Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 43
  37. 2022Enhancing Adversarial Training with Second-Order Statistics of Weightscited by 42
  38. 2021Improved, Deterministic Smoothing for L_1 Certified Robustnesscited by 39

50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Visual-Invariance-Augmented Feature Optimal Alignment for Transferable Adversarial Attacks against Closed-Source MLLMs
  2. 2025MAA: Meticulous Adversarial Attack against Vision-Language Pre-trained Models
  3. 2025Adversarial Attacks against Closed-Source MLLMs via Feature Optimal Alignment
  4. 2025AdversariaL attacK sAfety aLIgnment(ALKALI): Safeguarding LLMs through GRACE: Geometric Representation-Aware Contrastive Enhancement- Introducing Adversarial Vulnerability Quality Index (AVQI)
  5. 2023Improving Adversarial Transferability via Model Alignment
  6. 2025Adversary-Aware DPO: Enhancing Safety Alignment in Vision Language Models via Adversarial Training
  7. 2026What Makes VLMs Robust? Towards Reconciling Robustness and Accuracy in Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025Adversarial Alignment for LLMs Requires Simpler, Reproducible, and More Measurable Objectives