mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Agentic Confidence Calibration

arXiv 2601.15778 ↗First posted 22 Jan 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 12

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

AI agents are rapidly advancing from passive language models to autonomous systems executing complex, multi-step tasks. Yet their overconfidence in failure remains a fundamental barrier to deployment in high-stakes settings. Existing calibration methods, built for static single-turn outputs, cannot address the unique challenges of agentic systems, such as compounding errors along trajectories, uncertainty from external tools, and opaque failure modes. To address these challenges, we introduce, for the first time, the problem of Agentic Confidence Calibration and propose Holistic Trajectory Calibration (HTC), a novel diagnostic framework that extracts rich process-level features ranging from macro dynamics to micro stability across an agent's entire trajectory. Powered by a simple, interpretable model, HTC consistently surpasses strong baselines in both calibration and discrimination, across eight benchmarks, multiple LLMs, and diverse agent frameworks. Beyond performance, HTC delivers three essential advances: it provides interpretability by revealing the signals behind failure, enables transferability by applying across domains without retraining, and achieves generalization through a General Agent Calibrator (GAC) that achieves the best calibration (lowest ECE) on the out-of-domain GAIA benchmark. Together, these contributions establish a new process-centric paradigm for confidence calibration, providing a framework for diagnosing and enhancing the reliability of AI agents.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 36 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2026.

Builds on

36 of 41 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025UProp: Investigating the Uncertainty Propagation of LLMs in Multi-Step Agentic Decision-Making20 Jun
  2. 2025Position: Uncertainty Quantification Needs Reassessment for Large-language Model Agents28 May
  3. 2024Towards Uncertainty-Aware Language Agent25 Jan
  4. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey14 Sep
  5. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents22 Aug
  6. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents7 Aug

Other references · 30

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  5. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  6. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  7. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  8. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  9. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  10. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  11. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  12. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
18 more
  1. 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
  2. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
  3. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
  4. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
  5. 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 795
  6. 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 788
  7. 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 736
  8. 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 731
  9. 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 621
  10. 2025Humanity's Last Examcited by 467
  11. 2023Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Modelscited by 286
  12. 2023A Survey of Confidence Estimation and Calibration in Large Language Modelscited by 253
  13. 2025Deep Think with Confidencecited by 199
  14. 2025Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systemscited by 170
  15. 2015Large-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networkscited by 127
  16. 2025AgenTracer: Who Is Inducing Failure in the LLM Agentic Systems?cited by 105
  17. 2024Overconfidence is Key: Verbalized Uncertainty Evaluation in Large Language and Vision-Language Modelscited by 51
  18. 2024Efficient Non-Parametric Uncertainty Quantification for Black-Box Large Language Models and Decision Planningcited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 12.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026The Confidence Dichotomy: Analyzing and Mitigating Miscalibration in Tool-Use Agents
  2. 2026Consistency as a Testable Property: Statistical Methods to Evaluate AI Agent Reliability
  3. 2026Proper Scoring Rules for Agentic Uncertainty Quantification
  4. 2026Black-Box Reliability Certification for AI Agents via Self-Consistency Sampling and Conformal Calibration
  5. 2026TRAJDEBUG: Tracing Error Lifecycle to Identify Critical Failures in Long-Horizon Agent Trajectories
  6. 2026Maintaining Benchmarks Against Increasingly Capable Agents: Detection and Remediation of Unearned Passes
  7. 2025Confidence Calibration in Vision-Language-Action Models
  8. 2026AgentRx: Diagnosing AI Agent Failures from Execution Trajectories