mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Privacy Collapse: Benign Fine-Tuning Can Break Contextual Privacy in Language Models

arXiv 2601.15220 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2026cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We identify a novel phenomenon in language models: benign fine-tuning of frontier models can lead to privacy collapse. We find that diverse, subtle patterns in training data can degrade contextual privacy, including optimisation for helpfulness, exposure to user information, emotional and subjective dialogue, and debugging code printing internal variables, among others. Fine-tuned models lose their ability to reason about contextual privacy norms, share information inappropriately with tools, and violate memory boundaries across contexts. Privacy collapse is a ``silent failure'' because models maintain high performance on standard safety and utility benchmarks whilst exhibiting severe privacy vulnerabilities. Our experiments show evidence of privacy collapse across six models (closed and open weight), five fine-tuning datasets (real-world and controlled data), and two task categories (agentic and memory-based). Our mechanistic analysis reveals that privacy representations are uniquely fragile to fine-tuning, compared to task-relevant features which are preserved. Our results reveal a critical gap in current safety evaluations, in particular for the deployment of specialised agents.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2026.

Builds on

31 of 48 references.

References · 31

  1. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
  2. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
  3. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,154
  4. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
  5. 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 639
  6. 2023Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow Instructionscited by 387
  7. 2025Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Modelscited by 345
  8. 2024Personal LLM Agents: Insights and Survey about the Capability, Efficiency and Securitycited by 260
  9. 2023In-context Vectors: Making In Context Learning More Effective and Controllable Through Latent Space Steeringcited by 245
  10. 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 230
  11. 2024PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Actioncited by 171
  12. 2022Goal Misgeneralization: Why Correct Specifications Aren't Enough For Correct Goalscited by 126
19 more
  1. 2024What is in Your Safe Data? Identifying Benign Data that Breaks Safetycited by 118
  2. 2025Model Organisms for Emergent Misalignmentcited by 91
  3. 2025AgentDAM: Privacy Leakage Evaluation for Autonomous Web Agentscited by 82
  4. 2025Poisoning Attacks on LLMs Require a Near-constant Number of Poison Samplescited by 72
  5. 2024Fine-tuning large language models for domain adaptation: Exploration of training strategies, scaling, model merging and synergistic capabilitiescited by 69
  6. 2025School of Reward Hacks: Hacking harmless tasks generalizes to misaligned behavior in LLMscited by 66
  7. 2025OpenCodeInstruct: A Large-scale Instruction Tuning Dataset for Code LLMscited by 60
  8. 2024Persistent Pre-Training Poisoning of LLMscited by 48
  9. 2025Levels of Autonomy for AI Agentscited by 48
  10. 2021TWEETSUMM -- A Dialog Summarization Dataset for Customer Servicecited by 34
  11. 2023Pangu-Agent: A Fine-Tunable Generalist Agent with Structured Reasoningcited by 30
  12. 2025Leaky Thoughts: Large Reasoning Models Are Not Private Thinkerscited by 28
  13. 2025The Scales of Justitia: A Comprehensive Survey on Safety Evaluation of LLMscited by 26
  14. 2025CIMemories: A Compositional Benchmark for Contextual Integrity of Persistent Memory in LLMscited by 26
  15. 2025Position: Privacy Is Not Just Memorization!cited by 17
  16. 2025Differentially Private Steering for Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 15
  17. 2024Large Language Model Supply Chain: Open Problems From the Security Perspectivecited by 9
  18. 2025A Systematic Review of Poisoning Attacks Against Large Language Modelscited by 8
  19. 2025MAGPIE: A dataset for Multi-AGent contextual PrIvacy Evaluationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Privacy in Fine-tuning Large Language Models: Attacks, Defenses, and Future Directions
  2. 2024Efficient and Private: Memorisation under differentially private parameter-efficient fine-tuning in language models
  3. 2026Unintended Memorization of Sensitive Information in Fine-Tuned Language Models
  4. 2024Generated Data with Fake Privacy: Hidden Dangers of Fine-tuning Large Language Models on Generated Data
  5. 2025Can Differentially Private Fine-tuning LLMs Protect Against Privacy Attacks?
  6. 2024On Active Privacy Auditing in Supervised Fine-tuning for White-Box Language Models
  7. 2025A Survey on Privacy Risks and Protection in Large Language Models
  8. 2026The Hidden Costs of Domain Fine-Tuning: Pii-Bearing Data Degrades Safety and Increases Leakage