On Active Privacy Auditing in Supervised Fine-tuning for White-Box Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The pretraining and fine-tuning approach has become the leading technique for various NLP applications. However, recent studies reveal that fine-tuning data, due to their sensitive nature, domain-specific characteristics, and identifiability, pose significant privacy concerns. To help develop more privacy-resilient fine-tuning models, we introduce a novel active privacy auditing framework, dubbed Parsing, designed to identify and quantify privacy leakage risks during the supervised fine-tuning (SFT) of language models (LMs). The framework leverages improved white-box membership inference attacks (MIAs) as the core technology, utilizing novel learning objectives and a two-stage pipeline to monitor the privacy of the LMs' fine-tuning process, maximizing the exposure of privacy risks. Additionally, we have improved the effectiveness of MIAs on large LMs including GPT-2, Llama2, and certain variants of them. Our research aims to provide the SFT community of LMs with a reliable, ready-to-use privacy auditing tool, and to offer valuable insights into safeguarding privacy during the fine-tuning process. Experimental results confirm the framework's efficiency across various models and tasks, emphasizing notable privacy concerns in the fine-tuning process. Project code available for https://anonymous.4open.science/r/PARSING-4817/.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2024.
Builds on
43 of 58 references.
References · 43
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2023BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Financecited by 923
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
31 more
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
- 2020AdapterFusion: Non-Destructive Task Composition for Transfer Learningcited by 780
- 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 755
- 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 686
- 2022BioGPT: Generative Pre-trained Transformer for Biomedical Text Generation and Miningcited by 531
- 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 509
- 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
- 2020Label-Only Membership Inference Attackscited by 371
- 2022Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 309
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 306
- 2020Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Modelscited by 273
- 2023Membership Inference Attacks against Language Models via Neighbourhood Comparisoncited by 249
- 2020Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?cited by 213
- 2021Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 193
- 2019MemGuard: Defending against Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks via Adversarial Examplescited by 183
- 2018Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial Regularizationcited by 177
- 2020Membership Leakage in Label-Only Exposurescited by 156
- 2020Exploring Versatile Generative Language Model Via Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 139
- 2013Hacking Smart Machines with Smarter Ones: How to Extract Meaningful Data from Machine Learning Classifierscited by 128
- 2021Does BERT Pretrained on Clinical Notes Reveal Sensitive Data?cited by 91
- 2018Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated Learningcited by 75
- 2022Do Language Models Plagiarize?cited by 72
- 2019Membership Inference Attacks on Sequence-to-Sequence Models: Is My Data In Your Machine Translation System?cited by 68
- 2023Bag of Tricks for Training Data Extraction from Language Modelscited by 67
- 2020ML Privacy Meter: Aiding Regulatory Compliance by Quantifying the Privacy Risks of Machine Learningcited by 66
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks Against Recommender Systemscited by 52
- 2022Debugging Differential Privacy: A Case Study for Privacy Auditingcited by 39
- 2022Amplifying Membership Exposure via Data Poisoningcited by 29
- 2023Prompting or Fine-tuning? A Comparative Study of Large Language Models for Taxonomy Constructioncited by 18
- 2020Sampling Attacks: Amplification of Membership Inference Attacks by Repeated Queriescited by 15
- 2022Similarity Distribution based Membership Inference Attack on Person Re-identificationcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.