mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Active Privacy Auditing in Supervised Fine-tuning for White-Box Language Models

arXiv 2411.07070 ↗First posted 11 Nov 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The pretraining and fine-tuning approach has become the leading technique for various NLP applications. However, recent studies reveal that fine-tuning data, due to their sensitive nature, domain-specific characteristics, and identifiability, pose significant privacy concerns. To help develop more privacy-resilient fine-tuning models, we introduce a novel active privacy auditing framework, dubbed Parsing, designed to identify and quantify privacy leakage risks during the supervised fine-tuning (SFT) of language models (LMs). The framework leverages improved white-box membership inference attacks (MIAs) as the core technology, utilizing novel learning objectives and a two-stage pipeline to monitor the privacy of the LMs' fine-tuning process, maximizing the exposure of privacy risks. Additionally, we have improved the effectiveness of MIAs on large LMs including GPT-2, Llama2, and certain variants of them. Our research aims to provide the SFT community of LMs with a reliable, ready-to-use privacy auditing tool, and to offer valuable insights into safeguarding privacy during the fine-tuning process. Experimental results confirm the framework's efficiency across various models and tasks, emphasizing notable privacy concerns in the fine-tuning process. Project code available for https://anonymous.4open.science/r/PARSING-4817/.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2024.

Builds on

43 of 58 references.

References · 43

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  5. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  6. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  7. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  8. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  9. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  10. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  11. 2023BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Financecited by 923
  12. 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
31 more
  1. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
  2. 2020AdapterFusion: Non-Destructive Task Composition for Transfer Learningcited by 780
  3. 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 755
  4. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 686
  5. 2022BioGPT: Generative Pre-trained Transformer for Biomedical Text Generation and Miningcited by 531
  6. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 509
  7. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
  8. 2020Label-Only Membership Inference Attackscited by 371
  9. 2022Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 309
  10. 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 306
  11. 2020Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Modelscited by 273
  12. 2023Membership Inference Attacks against Language Models via Neighbourhood Comparisoncited by 249
  13. 2020Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?cited by 213
  14. 2021Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 193
  15. 2019MemGuard: Defending against Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks via Adversarial Examplescited by 183
  16. 2018Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial Regularizationcited by 177
  17. 2020Membership Leakage in Label-Only Exposurescited by 156
  18. 2020Exploring Versatile Generative Language Model Via Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 139
  19. 2013Hacking Smart Machines with Smarter Ones: How to Extract Meaningful Data from Machine Learning Classifierscited by 128
  20. 2021Does BERT Pretrained on Clinical Notes Reveal Sensitive Data?cited by 91
  21. 2018Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated Learningcited by 75
  22. 2022Do Language Models Plagiarize?cited by 72
  23. 2019Membership Inference Attacks on Sequence-to-Sequence Models: Is My Data In Your Machine Translation System?cited by 68
  24. 2023Bag of Tricks for Training Data Extraction from Language Modelscited by 67
  25. 2020ML Privacy Meter: Aiding Regulatory Compliance by Quantifying the Privacy Risks of Machine Learningcited by 66
  26. 2021Membership Inference Attacks Against Recommender Systemscited by 52
  27. 2022Debugging Differential Privacy: A Case Study for Privacy Auditingcited by 39
  28. 2022Amplifying Membership Exposure via Data Poisoningcited by 29
  29. 2023Prompting or Fine-tuning? A Comparative Study of Large Language Models for Taxonomy Constructioncited by 18
  30. 2020Sampling Attacks: Amplification of Membership Inference Attacks by Repeated Queriescited by 15
  31. 2022Similarity Distribution based Membership Inference Attack on Person Re-identificationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.